Search for: "True v True"
Results 581 - 600
of 33,917
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 May 2024, 4:09 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
24 May 2024, 3:58 am
Here, even accepting the allegations in the amended complaint as true and according the plaintiff the benefit of every possible favorable inference, the amended complaint did not allege conduct that is actionable under Judiciary Law § 487 (see Kaufman v Moritt Hock & Hamroff, LLP, 192 AD3d at 1093). [read post]
24 May 2024, 1:49 am
Ben Beadle of the NRLA said If true, it is hugely disappointing that this Bill will not now make it into law. [read post]
23 May 2024, 1:23 pm
” This is particularly true, Alito added, when the state counters that the moves were made for partisan reasons, rather than on the basis of race. [read post]
23 May 2024, 5:28 am
From Tuesday's decision in Robertson v. [read post]
22 May 2024, 9:00 pm
It’s true that CFPB v. [read post]
22 May 2024, 7:23 pm
Five months later, the Supreme Court granted cert in Obergefell v. [read post]
22 May 2024, 1:33 pm
., Appellants, v. [read post]
22 May 2024, 7:03 am
From Luke v. [read post]
22 May 2024, 6:00 am
In considering a motion pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7) to dismiss a complaint for failure to state a cause of action, the court must afford the pleading a liberal construction, accept the facts as alleged in the pleading as true, accord the plaintiff the benefit of every possible favorable inference, and determine only whether the facts as alleged fit within any cognizable legal theory (see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87; Bumpus v New York City Tr. [read post]
22 May 2024, 6:00 am
In considering a motion pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7) to dismiss a complaint for failure to state a cause of action, the court must afford the pleading a liberal construction, accept the facts as alleged in the pleading as true, accord the plaintiff the benefit of every possible favorable inference, and determine only whether the facts as alleged fit within any cognizable legal theory (see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87; Bumpus v New York City Tr. [read post]
22 May 2024, 4:00 am
The "Concerned Alumni of Princeton" would no doubt be proud.3) In 2010, Alito infamously mouthed the words "not true" during President Obama's State of the Union. [read post]
21 May 2024, 12:21 pm
See Mata v. [read post]
21 May 2024, 12:21 pm
See Mata v. [read post]
21 May 2024, 12:21 pm
See Mata v. [read post]
21 May 2024, 6:40 am
In Muldrow v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 9:01 pm
This is particularly true if the relevant fund is “tapped out” or would prefer to use the cash for other opportunities, and/or if the issuance requires a preemptive rights process. [read post]
20 May 2024, 8:40 am
By contrast, Paul-Emile’s theory might suggest a revisionist reading of Gonzales v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 7:24 am
(Editor’s Note: This article is part of our new symposium on the ICC and Israel-Hamas war.) [read post]
20 May 2024, 5:01 am
This was already the question in 1996 when [Ruth Bader] Ginsburg penned the majority opinion in United States v. [read post]