Search for: "U.S. District Court for Northern District of California" Results 581 - 600 of 3,618
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2010, 2:33 am by Mike
District Court for the Northern District of California have recently ruled in intellectual property cases, among them: Advanced Micro Devices v. [read post]
1 May 2013, 10:53 am by Erik Beck
Environmental Protection Agency, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California dismissed with leave to amend (pdf) a suit alleging that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) violated section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) by failing to consult with the United States Fish and Wildlife Service or the National Marine Fisheries Service on the effects of 382 registered pesticides on endangered and threatened species. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 2:15 pm
District Court, Northern District of California from 1994 to 1995. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 6:52 pm
Delving into "one of the darkest corners of antitrust law," the federal District Court for the Northern District of California recently determined what standard – the per se rule or the rule of reason – should apply to judge the setting of prices by members of a joint venture. [read post]
3 Mar 2013, 8:43 pm by Patent Docs
Genentech, Inc. et al. 4:13-cv-00919; filed February 28, 2013 in the Northern District of California • Plaintiffs: Eli Lilly and Company; Imclone Systems LLC • Defendants: Genentech, Inc.; City of Hope Declaratory judgment of invalidity, unenforceability, and noninfringement of of U.S. [read post]
12 May 2013, 9:02 pm by Patent Docs
Genentech, Inc. et al. 3:13-cv-02045; filed May 3, 2013 in the Northern District of California • Plaintiff: Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 5:48 am by Allan Blutstein
District Court for the Northern District of California, in a Dec. 26 ruling, ordered the release of about 20,000 emails exchanged between industry groups and 25 Trump officials within the next 10 months. [read post]
8 May 2012, 4:10 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
District Court for the Northern District of California ruled on March 21, 2012, that Plaintiff Mirsad Hajro was eligible for naturalization. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 6:31 pm
Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 4:15 am by IPWatchdog
District Court for the Northern District of California that resolved a claim construction dispute in the context of a motion to dismiss under Section 101 as per Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure prior to claim construction. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 9:26 am
[Alaska Senator Dan] Sullivan’s plan — introduced with five other senators — keeps California, Guam, Hawaii and the Northern Mariana Islands in the 9th Circuit.A new 12th U.S. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 1:05 pm by WIMS
Appealed  from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. [read post]
District Court for the Northern District of California issued a summary judgment ruling on October 16, 2009 holding that temporary employees of Kelly Services were owed overtime for time spent in interviews for job placement. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 9:53 am by Nassiri Law
District Court of Northern California, a federal judge granted the plaintiff’s motion for a partial summary judgment in the case wherein religious discrimination had been alleged. [read post]
16 Nov 2021, 4:15 am by Logan Murr
District Court for the Northern District of California that compelled arbitration and dismissed Rohm Semiconductor USA’s declaratory judgment action without prejudice, holding that an arbitrator must determine arbitrability. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 1:41 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
The United States District Court for the Northern District of California found that the asserted claims of the ’540 patent are not directed to patent eligible subject matter and are therefore invalid under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
15 Jul 2021, 9:15 am by Logan Murr
District Court for the Northern District of California’s decision that Sony Corporation of America, et al (Sony) did not infringe Bot M8 LLC’s (Bot M8) patents, again clarifying the pleading standard for patent infringement. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 7:21 pm
On March 7, 2008, after an 11-day trial, Judge Phyllis Hamilton of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California declared a mistrial in United States v. [read post]