Search for: "UNIFORM DISTRICT COURT RULES" Results 581 - 600 of 3,026
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Dec 2014, 5:07 am by Joy Waltemath
Supreme Court had not declared that “reformation may not be granted to a Rule 23(b)(2) class. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 7:57 pm by Camilla Alexandra Hrdy
 The other, which may or may not be the same thing, is that the Court is intent on preserving universal rules across all areas of law. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 1:44 pm by Rebecca Blaw
Boyd & Associates, 2013 WL 1927019 (May 10, 2013), the Fourth District Court of Appeal pushed this portion of Brinker to its conclusion. [read post]
10 May 2013, 11:49 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
In one case, a judge in the Southern District of New York on May 8 denied class certification (See here) for a group of magazine interns, holding that the interns failed to meet the commonality and predominance requirements of Rule 23. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 1:16 pm by The Law Office of Philip D. Cave
The following year, he was convicted by court martial in the Military District of Washington of, inter alia, one count of rape of another member of his platoon in violation of Article 120 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice. [read post]
The court treated all of the above as indicia of apparent authority, while acknowledging that the school district had not authorized the pages. [read post]
16 May 2014, 5:50 pm by H. Scott Leviant
Rite Aid Corporation (May 16, 2014), the Court of Appeal (Fourth Appellate District, Division One) reversed a trial court order decertifying a suitable seating claim.The plaintiff successfully certified a class action alleging failure to provide suitable seating. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 9:09 am by Stephen Bilkis
Thus, the court can presume that the Legislature intended that modifications of orders of child custody referred by the Supreme Court to the Family Court were to be governed by the procedural rules set forth in the Family Court Act, since these rules are special rules and vary from the civil practice rules in many ways. [read post]
21 May 2010, 12:24 pm by Sheppard Mullin
Multimedia’s substantive challenge to the preemption ruling, noting the differences between the CUTSA and the uniform act. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 9:50 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
This court is not applying a new rule of obviousness in this case. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 3:14 pm by Barbara S. Mishkin
The FTC announced settlements of two lawsuits filed in a California federal district court alleging similar violations of the FTC Act, the Telemarketing Sales Rule (TSR), and the Truth in Lending Act by providers of student debt relief services, their principals, and a Minnesota-based company that provided financing to customers of the providers involved in both complaints. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 3:38 am
 The Northern District of Illinois is one of the largest districts in the country, and uniformity among the District's judges would promote case management predictability for both the Court and the litigants. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 5:09 pm by Dennis Crouch
  In my view, the uniformity has now largely been realized, at least within the court system, once Phillips v. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 9:30 pm by Alina Artunian
By establishing guidelines for uniform sentences for individuals convicted of the same offense, the federal courts aim to prevent sentencing disparities and inequities. [read post]
15 Dec 2006, 9:26 pm by Boris
District Court for the Northern District of Illinois denied a defendant's Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss a three-count complaint alleging (1) trademark infringement under Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act (actually an unfair competition claim), (2) infringement under the Illinois Trademark Registration and Protection Act, and (3) deceptive trade practices under the Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act (UDTPA). [read post]