Search for: "US v. Hopkins" Results 581 - 600 of 709
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman and Grant Hayden
Hopkins (1989), that reliance on sex-role stereotyping can be an actionable form of employment discrimination. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 4:01 pm by Cody M. Poplin
Susan flagged the Department of Justice’s motion to vacate the preliminary injunction in Klayman v. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 9:32 am by Richard Goldfarb
  While I don't know either that the dutched cocoa used by Ben & Jerry's was potassium carbonate or what process was used to refine it, I will posit that if the process in Samuel Hopkins's patent was used, that would indeed be as natural as, well, hold that thought for a second. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 7:22 pm
  For the Chinese central authorities, this amounts to lawfare, though that is a tactic that they themselves have been using as well. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 12:58 pm by Alex R. McQuade
Meanwhile, the Guardian tells us that the British parliament unanimously declared that the Islamic State’s actions against Yazidis and Christians qualify as genocide. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 2:39 pm by Cynthia L. Hackerott
Supreme Court ruled, in Price Waterhouse v Hopkins (49 EPD ¶38,936), that discrimination based on gender stereotyping (i.e. failing to act and appear according to expectations defined by gender) could constitute a violation of Title VII. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 1:00 pm by Mark Murakami
Hopkins, Waldo & Lyle, P.C., Norfolk, Virginia Contaminated Land: The Impact on Use, Utility, Value and Mitigation – Darius W. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 3:29 am by Peter Mahler
App. 2004] (Nixon does not preclude common-law claim), Reserve Solutions, Inc. v Vernaglia, 438 F Supp 2d 280 [SDNY 2006] (same), and Nightingale & Associates v Hopkins, 2008 US Dist LEXIS 90204 [DNJ Nov. 5, 2008] (Nixon precludes common-law claim). [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
Media Writes has looked at the Katie Hopkins and Jack Munroe case in the context of other defamation cases about Tweets. [read post]