Search for: "US v. Louis" Results 581 - 600 of 2,389
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Aug 2019, 2:51 am
Nonetheless, the Board found the connotations and commercial impressions of the marks to be "quite dissimilar" because of the presence of the word CREEK in applicant's mark.The circumstances of this case are very similar, if not identical, to those in Champagne Louis Roederer S.A. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 2:00 am by Ben
There have been two major US decisions in the word of music and sound recordings with a win for Kraftwerk and a loss for Katy Perry, and in the background a third (the Led Zepplin "Stairway to Heaven" case waits for an upcoming an en banc appeal in the Ninth Circuit, and a fourth involving Ed Sheerhan in turn waiting for that decision (Sheerhan v Townsend) with Judge Louis L Stanton acknowledging that as the appeal judges will be considering some copyright… [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal Campaigns Say They’ll Match Political Contributions. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 9:10 am by Schachtman
Kelly,[1] in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, who may well have been the first judge to grapple with a litigation attempt to use meta-analysis to show a causal association. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  In some ways, I am simply asking whether the use of the term “translation” really adds much, if anything, to the more standard term “interpretation. [read post]
31 May 2019, 3:54 am by Tinker Ready
Ahmad Rahbar “is a man we need to keep happy” because the previous year “he generated over $11 million in revenues for us,” according to the government’s lawsuit. [read post]
16 May 2019, 10:21 am by Jim Martin
In the court’s decision, Federal Baseball Club of Baltimore v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 7:29 am by Andrew Hamm
The following is a series of questions prompted by the forthcoming publication of Michael Bobelian’s “Battle for the Marble Palace: Abe Fortas, Earl Warren, Lyndon Johnson, Richard Nixon, and the Forging of the Modern Supreme Court” (Schaffner Press, 2019). [read post]