Search for: "United States v. Ali" Results 581 - 600 of 755
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2011, 11:00 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
    To this end, the defendants, assisted by others in the United States and Pakistan, conspired to provide and provided material support to the Pakistani Taliban by soliciting, collecting and transferring money from the United States to supporters of the Pakistani Taliban, primarily using bank accounts and wire transfer services in the United States and Pakistan. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm by Bexis
  Such products, the ALI recognized, were “especially common” in the context of prescription drugs:There are some products which, in the present state of human knowledge, are quite incapable of being made safe for their intended and ordinary use. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 12:22 pm by Jonathan Hafetz
Brennan all but acknowledged that the prior military detention of individuals arrested in the United States– Jose Padilla and Ali al-Marri (I represented the latter)–were illegal. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 5:14 pm
The intervention in the Samantar case by the State Department is particularly significant because the United States only occasionally intervenes in litigation, and very rarely intervenes to claim that a defendant is not entitled to immunity. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 7:05 pm by Badrinath Srinivasan
As a result, choice of law and jurisdiction rules potentially expose firms that do business nationally or internationally to oppressive law in any of the US states. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 3:30 am by Jason Rantanen
  In addition, some early empirical studies used the United States Patent Quarterly as their source (see, e.g., John R. [read post]