Search for: "United States v. Fox" Results 581 - 600 of 1,287
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jan 2018, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
Matal, and Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 9:30 pm by Mitra Sharafi
Islam v Secretary of State for the Home Department, R v Immigration Appeal Tribunal and Another, ex parte Shah (1999) Nora Honkala72. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 6:00 am by Jon Robinson
The Supreme Court of the United States previously stated that Congress, when enacting the statute quoted above, spoke with great clarity as to its intention. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 10:04 am by Kiera Flynn
At The Volokh Conspiracy, Orin Kerr analyzes the government’s brief in the GPS tracking case, United States v. [read post]
6 May 2020, 3:49 am by Edith Roberts
” At Vox, Ian Millhiser writes that “[n]ext week, the Supreme Court will hear three cases that could upend one of the most basic assumptions that the Court has maintained since the Nixon years — that the president of the United States is not above scrutiny or immune from investigation. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 6:37 am by David Kravets
Here is a summary of important cases that have been granted a hearing by the Supreme Court: An abandoned FBI vehicle-tracking device/Wired.com United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 11:14 am by Erin Miller
Times previews Holder v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 8:10 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Background to the Story On October 23, 2014, the United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia determined that NAGPRA does not apply to the requested repatriation of Jim Thorpe’s remains. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
The United States actually had a society for the prevention of cruelty to animals before it had one for children, so this is no mean feat! [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 2:09 am by Eliana Baer
  Of the significance in that regard is the New Jersey case which made national headlines in 2011, Innes v. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 1:51 pm by Steve Sady
§ 3553(a) and United States v Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), a further reduction generally would not be appropriate. [read post]