Search for: "United States v. Haire"
Results 581 - 600
of 751
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Sep 2018, 9:30 pm
Dissenting in Mingo Logan Coal v. [read post]
1 May 2009, 10:00 am
(Creative Commons) Copyright Office hearing on proposed exemptions to DMCA ban on DRM circumvention (EFF) (Ars Technica) Open educational resources and implementation of the US Recovery Act (Creative Commons) Twitter and the DMCA: A fine mess (The Trademark Blog) US Copyright – Lawsuits and strategic steps Apple – Apple sued by BluWiki operator OdioWorks, seeking declaratory judgment that its postings do not violate DMCA (Ars Technica) (EFF) Google – District… [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 1:58 am
(IPKat) United Kingdom IPO changes wording of Patent Rules (Out-Law) Online design registration – latest news (IPKat) (IPKat) PCC Page 37: The Octopus – keeping documents up its sleeve (PatLit) Neatly wrapped: UDR in the PCC: Albert Packaging & Ors v Nampak Cartons & Healthcare (JIPLP) Perplexing perpetual protection (not Peter Pan) (1709 Copyright Blog) United States US Patent Reform Patent reform 2011: Vote scheduled at the… [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 2:03 pm
In a 2012 case called United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 8:50 am
” State v. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 11:59 pm
The knighthood slipping tantalisingly further away, as his wife ruffled what is left of his hair and assuring him that his cabinet post is the 21st century equivalent of the 1970s secretary of state for Northern Ireland in the popularity/career building stakes. [read post]
2 Sep 2021, 12:02 pm
Blue states could also use the same approach to get around the Supreme Court's First Amendment rulings on campaign finance, such as the Citizens United decision. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 6:17 am
He had not, however, seen patients since 2001 and was no longer licensed to practice medicine in the United States. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 6:17 am
He had not, however, seen patients since 2001 and was no longer licensed to practice medicine in the United States. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 4:40 am
PIRATES OF THE CARRIBEAN AND THE TEST OF SUBSTANTIAL SIMILARITYThe United States District Court for the Central District of California went on to rule that Walt Disney’s “Pirates of the Caribbean” had not lifted copyrighted elements from the screenplay of the same name. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 9:35 am
In support of that assertion, the State cites United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 2:04 pm
In Schroer v. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 5:56 am
Supreme Court issued its ruling in Moore v. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 12:57 pm
See Hoven v. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 5:54 pm
United States The satirical publication The Onion has filed an amicus curiae brief with th [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 3:00 am
Earnings Calls: The Trump Factor This WSJ article notes that there’s a new “elephant in the room” during corporate earnings calls – the President of the United States: Of the 242 companies in the S&P 500 index that held conference calls or other investor events in January, half mentioned Mr. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 6:42 am
"This changed in 2005 in United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 3:06 am
The “rest of the story” (in the words of the late Paul Harvey) is that Pepsi is giving away millions of dollars this year to fund charities of all persuasions across the United States. [read post]
1 May 2008, 7:43 am
I would argue that the United States constitution recognizes the liberty interests of actual families, families in fact, families that still would exist as coresidential and ocmmitted social units in the absence of law -- and not the asserted property rights of individuals in and to the products of their discarded gametes. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 7:01 am
A search is unconstitutional not in the abstract but only to the extent it impermissibly infringes on the particular defendant's reasonable expectation of privacy (United States v Payner, 447 US 727, 731 [1980] ["the defendant's Fourth Amendment rights are violated only when the challenged conduct invaded his legitimate expectation of privacy rather than that of a third party"] [emphasis in original]). [read post]
