Search for: "United States v. Henry" Results 581 - 600 of 1,245
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm by Lucie Olejnikova
Team Members: Joseph Fortunato (3L), Sameer Ponkshe (3L) In this year’s competition titled United States v. [read post]
28 May 2015, 7:44 am
Langbein, The Disappearance of Civil Trial in the United States, 122 Yale Law Journal 522, 547-48 (2012).] [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 1:34 pm by Richard M. Re
” Arguing for the United States, Assistant to the Solicitor General John Bash advanced a kind of hybrid position. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 1:35 pm
In four separate unanimous opinions, issued yesterday, the Florida Supreme Court has addressed issues relating to the United States Supreme Court's decisions in  Miller v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 12:23 pm
*****PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATE Never too late 35 [week ending Sunday 1 March] – EPO v SUEPO | Supreme Petfoods Ltd v Henry Bell & Co (Grantham) Ltd | UK IPO on EPO | Scents and copyright | GIs under scrutiny | UPC test-drive | Is UK failing to protect innovation? [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 4:30 am by SHG
Chemerinsky notes in the cert petition that 9th Circuit Chief Judge Alex Kozinski wrote in his dissent from denial of en banc review in United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 10:05 am by Terry Hart
Following World War II, the United Nations was formed to promote international cooperation, and in 1948, it drafted the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), the first global ex [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 7:42 am by MBettman
In each case, the warrantless placement of the GPS on the defendant’s vehicle occurred before the 2012 United States Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 4:30 am
That doctrine comes into play when: (1) the federal plaintiff lost in state court; (2) the plaintiff complains of some injury from the state court judgment; (3) the state court judgment antedated the filing of the federal case; and (4) the plaintiff is inviting the federal court to reject the state court judgment.   The plaintiffs appealed that decision to the Third Circuit, and that’s where we are today: Johnson v. [read post]