Search for: "United States v. K"
Results 581 - 600
of 3,355
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Sep 2018, 4:26 am
Thereafter, the plaintiff, pro se, commenced an action in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (hereinafter the District Court) against the United States, inter alia, to recover damages for medical malpractice and wrongful death. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 2:51 pm
UNITED STATES, AND THIS COURT’S OPINION IN UNITED STATES v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 8:47 am
National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), the United States Supreme Court held that the NLRB needs at least three members to exercise its authority. [read post]
29 Oct 2006, 10:00 pm
by Laura K. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 12:49 pm
United States, 930 F.2d 867, 871 n.2 (Fed. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 3:26 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 8:10 am
United States, and can be read here. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 10:58 am
On March 25, 2015, the Supreme Court of the United States issued a long-awaited decision in Young v. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 11:31 am
The “D” indicator joins the “K” indicator used to denote countries where there is a risk of kidnapping and hostage-taking by non-state actors. [read post]
30 Aug 2018, 4:44 pm
In an August 24, 2018 opinion in United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 11:43 am
United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement Agency (ICE) (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 4:34 am
It appears that Fokker deliberately misused this exception to justify shipments from the United States. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 9:04 am
United States, 129 S. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 12:26 am
Pierce Marshall Reply Brief for Petitioner Howard K. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 7:04 am
We previously reported on developments in various United States Courts of Appeal decisions concerning reverse payments in Hatch-Waxman litigation settlements - that is, payments made by branded pharmaceutical patent holders to generic challengers to postpone market entry of the generic product. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 10:39 am
“The right to public access ‘serves to promote trustworthiness of the judicial process, to curb judicial abuses, and to provide the public with a more complete understanding of the judicial system, including a better perception of its fairness.'” United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 5:26 am
Bielski, Case No. 22-105 (oral argument Mar. 21, 2023, in the Supreme Court of the United States). [read post]
3 May 2017, 6:01 am
The decision is United States v. [read post]
3 May 2017, 6:01 am
The decision is United States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 7:02 am
Following the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Christopher v. [read post]
