Search for: "United States v. State of New Jersey" Results 581 - 600 of 3,508
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2020, 6:12 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
United States (Endangered Species Act; Water Rights)Cherokee Nation v. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 1:01 pm by Unknown
United States (Endangered Species Act; Water Rights)Cherokee Nation v. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 2:56 pm by Andrew Crocker
Meanwhile, state supreme courts in New Jersey and Oregon are also considering this issue. [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 9:05 pm by Guest Opinion
  Cousins Subs, LaRosa’s Pizzerias, Fired Pie, Jersey Mike’s and many other fast food restaurants have announced that they are offering free meals or special offers to help medical workers get through the crisis. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 5:14 am by Richard Altieri, Margaret Taylor
On June 1, President Trump spoke to governors and the public about deploying the military within the United States. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 8:38 am by John Elwood
United States, 19-7320, a sequel to Stokeling v. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 10:13 am by Schachtman
In any event, under the federal RICO statute (as opposed to the analogous state RICO statutes) showing perjury in a state court proceeding will not be enough to state a valid claim. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 1:07 pm by Robert Liles
  New Jersey In this case, the New Jersey Office of the Comptroller, Medicaid Fraud Division, (New Jersey Comptroller) alleged that one of its Medicaid providers had improperly billed 99050 for services which it provided during “regular office hours. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 1:07 pm by Robert Liles
New Jersey In this case, the New Jersey Office of the Comptroller, Medicaid Fraud Division, (New Jersey Comptroller) alleged that one of its Medicaid providers had improperly billed 99050 for services which it provided during “regular office hours. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 8:15 am by John Elwood
Texas and United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 10:35 am by Schachtman
Federal and State Prosecutions against Physicians and Screening Companies After Judge Jack’s exposé of fraudulent and false diagnoses in the silicosis MDL, various news media reported that the United States Attorney’s office in the Southern District of New York was investigating possible criminal charges against the physicians and lawyers who orchestrated the screenings. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 5:48 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
When the debtors were unable to repay their debts, the Gans defendants obtained judgments against them in New Jersey and sought their enforcement in New York. [read post]
29 May 2020, 4:06 pm by Eugene Volokh
Defendant maintains Executive Order 34 only suggests "residents of States of New York, New Jersey, and Connecticut should refrain from travel to Maine" (emphasis added), and that this suggestion is not criminally enforceable. [read post]