Search for: "United States v. Stock"
Results 581 - 600
of 2,618
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Nov 2015, 9:00 am
Halliburton Co. will head back to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, with perhaps another trip to the Supreme Court to follow. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 10:37 am
In Stadnick v. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 10:37 am
In Stadnick v. [read post]
10 Mar 2012, 8:52 am
The article also dismissed this claim as overly “ambitious” for a company that “trades at only eight cents per share on the lowly ‘pink sheets’ in the United States”. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 6:09 am
The case before the Supreme Court, Morrison v. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 4:00 am
V. [read post]
28 Sep 2007, 1:38 pm
The petition highlighted the circuit split between the Ninth Circuit's Miller case and the Second Circuit's holding that no showing of intent is required for a defendant to invoke a return-of-capital defense (U.S. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 4:58 pm
In Lines v. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 5:14 am
Note in Nautilus, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Oct 2008, 11:32 am
A recent decision of the Bombay High Court in CIT v. [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 10:41 pm
” DHS & DOJ – Asylum Grants & Revocations: A panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) had no authority to terminate the asylum status of petitioner in Nijjar v. [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 10:41 pm
” DHS & DOJ – Asylum Grants & Revocations: A panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) had no authority to terminate the asylum status of petitioner in Nijjar v. [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 8:56 am
Facts: This case (Ferraro v. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 9:11 am
Facts: This case (Kerek v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 5:00 am
In this case, there is no dispute that the Templeton stock was not listed on a domestic stock exchange, and so the only issue under Morrison is whether the “purchase or sale” occurred in the United States. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 12:56 pm
In Varjabedian v. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 6:45 am
The decision, if broadly followed by other courts, would threaten foreign issuers with potentially expansive securities liability in U.S. courts, even where those issuers had little involvement with the issuance of securities in the United States and even with respect to shares listed only on foreign exchanges, notwithstanding the Supreme Court’s attempt to limit such liability in Morrison v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:38 pm
In Gibbons v. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 5:59 am
In the second case, United Food & Commercial Workers Union & Participating Food Industry Employers Tri-State Pension Fund v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 7:17 am
May 05, 2009)—In this recent case, the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York issued an unpublished opinion denying a host of motions to dismiss and granting leave to the plaintiffs to file a Second Amended Complaint. [read post]
