Search for: "United States v. United States"
Results 581 - 600
of 94,045
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Aug 2008, 8:12 am
McKinnon v Government of the United States of America House of Lords “A plea bargain offered by a foreign prosecutor to an accused person whose extradition was sought, particularly if offered during a regulated process of plea-bargaining, did not constitute an abuse of process unless it was so extreme as to amount to a threat of unlawful action which imperilled the integrity of the extradition process. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 3:50 am
Norris v Government of United States of America (No 2) [2009] UKSC 9; [2010] WLR (D) 52 “It was only if some quite exceptionally compelling feature, or combination of features, was present that interference with the right to family life under art 8(1) of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms consequent upon extradition would be other than proportionate to the objective that extradition served. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 9:14 am
McKinnon v Government of the United States of America [2008] UKHL 59; [2008] WLR (D) 266 “A foreign prosecuting authority's plea bargain offer to an accused person whose extradition was sought, did not constitute an abuse of process unless the predicted consequences of refusing the offer were so extreme as to amount to a threat of unlawful action which imperilled the integrity of the extradition process. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 11:07 am
United States, which presents the question whether the Federal Sentencing Guidelines are binding when a district court imposes a new sentence pursuant to a revised guideline range under 18 U.S.C. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 1:58 am
Salazar-Duarte v Government of the United States of America [2010] EWHC 3150 (Admin); [2010] WLR (D) 313 “For the purposes of s 103(9) of the Extradition Act 2003, the person whose extradition was sought was deemed to be informed of the extradition order against him when the solicitors acting on his behalf received a letter, whether by post, fax or e-mail, which informed him that the order had been made. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 6:20 pm
Under United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 3:36 pm
The Supreme Court on March 3 issued a ruling in United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 6:45 am
The case also has implications for the enforcement of foreign judgments and arbitral awards in the United States. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 10:32 am
It's not okay to point a gun at a child while s/he's handcuffed and on the ground.Even if you're the United States. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 1:38 pm
District Court, District of Columbia Docket Number: 1:23-cr-00257 Citation: United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 9:55 am
United States, No. 09-989. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 3:04 am
Here are the briefs in United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 4:47 am
United States. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 3:29 pm
The petitioner in Gamble v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 3:45 pm
This is dispositive proof that the Presidency is also not an "office *** under the United States" for the purposes of Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment.The post Offices Under the United States and the Oral Argument in Trump v. [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 12:59 pm
My friend Chris Guzelian thinks that I have jumped the shark in joining with Professors Makuch and Lash in filing an amicus brief in United States v. [read post]
21 Apr 2018, 12:41 pm
S. 61 (1975) (per curiam)United States v. [read post]
8 May 2022, 12:15 pm
United States. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 2:05 pm
The United States Supreme Court sent shock waves to the criminal defense community with their decision in Carpenter V. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 11:55 am
United States (10-5400), decided June 16, 2011. [read post]
