Search for: "W. E. Davis"
Results 581 - 600
of 678
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Feb 2017, 1:37 pm
This post examines an opinion from the Court of Appeals of Texas, El Paso: O’Brien v. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
New Massachusetts companies. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 11:45 am
The "listed residence" was shown as 1225 E. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 3:05 pm
This post and the next are follow-ups to my collection of posts on Trump v. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 7:52 am
Oct. 29, 2019.)Laws of 2019, Ch 491, effective January 15, 2020, amended Domestic Relations Law §112 and Public Health Law The public health law was amended by adding a new section, § 4138-e. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 10:38 am
Metcalf, Gilbert E. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Do Critics of Police Have the First Amendment Procedural Protections That Nazis Get?
22 Jan 2021, 8:26 am
" The judge responded by issuing a preliminary injunction ordering the defendants not to "publiciz[e], through social media or other channels, Plaintiff's personal identifying information," which apparently includes the policeman's name.) [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 7:17 am
“[W]hether the court will be able to fashion a reasonable allocation of parental responsibilities between all parents if the relocation occurs. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 9:01 pm
Gore litigation 20 years ago that explicitly eschewed any determinations on the merits of any legal claims, where the Justices said explicitly that “[w]e decline . . . to review the federal questions asserted to be present”—somehow overrides much more directly applicable precedent from just six years ago, precedent which the Degraffenreid dissenters don’t even mention much less grapple with.But even putting aside for the moment the ever-more-apparent… [read post]
9 Jan 2010, 11:03 pm
Kasky, 54 Case W. [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
Parke-Davis, 733 P.2d 507, 515-16 (Wash. 1987); Bond v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
Parke, Davis & Co., 507 P.2d 653, 660 (Cal. 1973). [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 5:37 am
The assurance of fairness preserved by public presence at a trial is not lost when one party's cause is pursued under a fictitious name.[8] Nonetheless, even courts that take this view acknowledge that "there remains a clear and strong First Amendment interest in ensuring that '[w]hat transpires in the courtroom is public property.'"[9] And other courts put it even more strongly: [L]awsuits are public events and the public has a legitimate interest in knowing the… [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 11:33 am
I could do this 24×7 - it’s digital crack.about 12 hours ago from TweetDeck RT @guykawasaki: For the Late-Night Crowd: What’s the Size of Your Twitter e-Penis? [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am
When historians look back at the copyright worlf in 2017 (if our attention spans allow us to have roles such as a 'historian' in the future!) [read post]
15 Sep 2022, 1:24 pm
Edward K. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 7:37 am
Manorcare of Palos Heights East 7850 W. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
”[38] As then-Commissioner Paul Atkins once said, “[W]e must be vigilant that the shareholder proposal process does not result in the tyranny of the minority. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 7:01 pm
Furthermore, collective bargaining agreements or other contracts or other federal, state or local laws also sometimes impose additional requirements for employers to pay higher “prevailing wages,” apply special rules for counting compensable work hours, and provide specified fringe benefits or other special compensation or protections or other wages, when the employer is a government contractor or subcontractor covered by the Service Contract Act, the Davis Bacon Act… [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 2:14 pm
Publishers, c2009.Civil ProcedureKF8841 .G59 2009The Glannon guide to civil procedure : learning civil procedure through multiple-choice questions and analysis / Joseph W. [read post]
