Search for: "Wells v. Department of Health and Human Services" Results 581 - 600 of 1,280
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Dec 2017, 4:30 am by Michael Madison
My primary goal in this post is to set out those themes in a thoughtful way, to suggest that they should be interwoven in future-oriented discussions, and in doing so to promote the production of actionable plans for institutional designs to support (i) prospective lawyers; (ii) law teachers, faculties, and schools; (iii) institutional leadership in higher education, the bench and bar, regulators, and organizations and institutions that consume and rely on law and legal services; (iv)… [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 5:26 am by Steve Lubet
(This accords with AAUP principles as well.) [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:40 pm by The Regulatory Review
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Endrew F. v. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:40 pm by The Regulatory Review
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Endrew F. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 10:36 am by Marty Lederman
  The government also admitted at oral argument that, in light of the district court’s order, the Department of Health and Human Services does not even need to complete its own self-created internal “best interests” form. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 2:37 pm by Maseeh Moradi
The Department of Health and Human Services provided briefing memos to The Washington Post stating that the new policy “will result in some persons covered in plans of newly exempt entities not receiving coverage or payments for contraceptive services. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 3:44 pm
There is irony here, this technique, refined and used well against the Russians and others by the Obama administration, continues to be expanded as a tool of U.S. foreign policy in the era of the "better deal. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 4:47 am by Marty Lederman
  That court, by a vote of 6 to 3, denied the government’s motion to stay a preliminary injunction that Judge Tanya Chutkan issued against officials of the Department of Health and Human Services, prohibiting them from interfering with the efforts of Doe’s guardian and attorney ad litem to transport her to a clinic to obtain an abortion. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
Casey – as well as from a case in which these rights were applied to minors—Bellotti v. [read post]
7 Oct 2017, 7:14 pm by Howard Friedman
  A press release from the Department of Health and Human Service explains the new rules:The Departments of Health and Human Services, Treasury, and Labor are announcing two companion interim final rules that provide conscience protections to Americans who have a religious or moral objection to paying for health insurance that covers contraceptive/ abortifacient services. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 9:01 pm by Tamar Frankel
” (v) “How often is your account rebalanced? [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 6:41 am by Dan Carvajal
The legislation enacted other tax changes as well. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 4:09 pm by Arthur F. Coon
§ 136a), and then by the Department following its own review and evaluation to ensure that when used in conformance with its labeling the pesticides will be effective and not harm human health or the environment. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 4:09 pm by Arthur F. Coon
§ 136a), and then by the Department following its own review and evaluation to ensure that when used in conformance with its labeling the pesticides will be effective and not harm human health or the environment. [read post]