Search for: "Williams v. Doe"
Results 581 - 600
of 7,878
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2015, 2:14 pm
The Second Circuit does not often reverse criminal convictions outright, but it does so here, ruling that the trial court denied the defendant a new trial when it allowed the jury to hear that the defendant had threatened to kill a government informant,The case is United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2022, 6:40 am
But the Court of Appeals finds the arresting officer has qualified immunity and the case is dismissed.The case is DuBois v. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 10:29 pm
Indiana, Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 10:29 pm
Indiana, Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 7:42 am
State v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 5:50 am
On 19 May 2023, Mrs Justice Heather Williams handed down judgment in Prismall v Google UK Limited & Another [2023] EWHC 1169 (KB). [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 2:55 am
The Williams v. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 11:47 am
The bankruptcy trustee, William G. [read post]
2 May 2022, 11:25 am
And the family got the Erie County Supreme Court to order Buffalo General to continue organ-sustaining treatment until they can get that second opinion (No. 803987/2022).The problem is that the family's chosen neurologist, William Coplin, does not have privileges at Buffalo General. [read post]
31 Oct 2006, 6:38 am
Williams) being argued today on the limits of punitive damages. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 1:04 am
In People v. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 9:41 am
., et al. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 11:00 pm
In Locke v. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 12:26 pm
In a recent symposium on Nancy MacLean’s book Democracy in Chains, Duke economist William Darity tries to defend her claim that Brown v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 12:46 pm
In United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 11:42 am
Astiana v. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 10:35 am
Williams, 339 N.C.1, 24 (1994). [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 5:20 am
In Miles v. [read post]
30 May 2018, 5:00 am
Judge William Pryor cited his opinion in Vergara for the proposition that Riley categorically “does not apply to searches at the border,” and he repeatedly declined to follow its reasoning. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 2:28 am
., v. [read post]
