Search for: "Wright v. Wells" Results 581 - 600 of 1,063
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Feb 2023, 4:47 am by Brian Cordery (Bristows)
Outside of the IP world, in Wright v McCormack [2022] EWHC 3343 (KB), the High Court went as far as to issue contempt proceedings, on its own initiative, where posts on the Slack messaging platform and an email that had been forwarded where deemed to have disclosed the substance of a draft judgment in libel proceedings. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 6:59 pm
It is well-established that a claim for infringement arises under federal law. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 4:27 am
" PLN is seeking compensatory, punitive and nominal damages plus declaratory and injunctive relief for violation of its rights under the First and Fourteenth Amendments, as well as attorney fees and costs.The case is Prison Legal News v. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 6:08 am by Dr. Shezad Malik
Smith & Nephew, which started the MoM craze with its Birmingham line of MoM devices is also under the gun as well as Wright’s line of Conserve MoM hip implants. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 12:19 pm by Adrian Lurssen
Why You Should Fight Lawsuits by Debt Buying Companies - by John Skiba15 Symptoms that a Plan Sponsor's Retirement Plan might be "Ill" - by The Rosenbaum Law Firm P.C.US v. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 11:34 am
Still, with recent notable works like Nudge and thought-provoking posts like this one from Josh Wright (on Jones v. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 8:43 pm
Prentky, Sexual Predator Laws: A Two-Decade Retrospective Mary Graw Leary, Kennedy v. [read post]
27 Feb 2022, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
On Thursday 24 February 2022 HHJ Lewis heard an application for summary judgment in the case of Wright v Granath. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 4:35 am
 It is a matter of great happiness to the IPKat and Merpel that these posts have been so well received. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 2:00 am by INFORRM
On 15 June 2023, the Court of Appeal (Singh, Andrews and Warby LJJ) heard the claimant’s appeal in the case of Wright v McCormack. [read post]
12 May 2008, 2:37 pm
In this antitrust case, we consider the legality of an agreement between non-party Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan ("BCBSM") and the Defendants-Appellees, Wright & Filippis, Inc. and its subsidiary ABP Administration, Inc. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 2:06 pm by Mike "No Man" Navarre
James Cannell argued that under the test established in Boumediene v. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 2:29 pm by Ken
Hr’g Tr., Sunlust Pictures, LLC v. [read post]
The Board in GM said it would now apply its well-worn test, first set forth in Wright Line, 251 NLRB 1083 (1980), enfd. 662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981), cert. denied 455 U.S. 989 (1982), approved in NLRB v. [read post]