Search for: "1-8 Doe"
Results 5981 - 6000
of 32,310
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Sep 2019, 10:02 am
Furtive movements 8. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 11:58 pm
Claim 1 of the ’685 patent recites:A fusion protein, comprising (...) and Hubbell is a named inventor.The legal issue turns on: It is undisputed that, although the ’509 applicationand the ’685 patent have two inventors in common –Hubbell and Schense – they do not have identical inventiveentities and have neither common owners norcommon assignees.Further relevant details come from the history of the '509:The ’509 application is a continuation of… [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 7:11 am
Philip Havers QC of 1 Crown Office represented Martin in this case. [read post]
5 May 2019, 10:39 am
The questions posed are whether the White Paper demonstrates sufficient certainty and precision in respect of each of the following matters.1. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 12:38 pm
Does, 2013 WL 1907059. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 12:38 pm
Does, 2013 WL 1907059. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 3:01 pm
First of all, as regards the invention defined in the present claims, the description explains in detail the different aspects of the steps of the invention […] and also illustrates with reference to Figures 5 to 8 an example of implementation of the claimed invention; the description therefore does provide a sufficiently detailed description of at least one way of carrying out the presently claimed invention, using examples and referring to the drawings as stipulated by R… [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 2:41 pm
Patry, Copyright §3:151, p. 3-485 (2016)). [8] Id. at 8. [9] Id. at 5. [10] Id. at 7. [11] Id. [12] Id. at 10. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 2:41 pm
Patry, Copyright §3:151, p. 3-485 (2016)). [8] Id. at 8. [9] Id. at 5. [10] Id. at 7. [11] Id. [12] Id. at 10. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 2:08 pm
[8] Id [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 10:26 pm
The law is clear that affidavits are not admissible at trial.[1] Defendant accordingly objects to all portions of Alphabet's affidavit that purport to adduce facts about the case. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 1:34 pm
Id. at *8-9. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 5:01 pm
Figure 8). [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 5:16 am
Circuit case which found that visa sponsors in the United States had standing to assert that the State Department’s refusal to process visa applications of Vietnamese citizens living in Hong Kong violated 8 U.S.C. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 7:55 pm
See id., at 348 n.8.) [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 1:43 pm
§ 227(a)(1). [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 1:43 pm
§ 227(a)(1). [read post]
2 Mar 2007, 7:40 am
Charge filed by Carlos Serrano, an Individual; complaint alleged violation of Section 8(b)(1)(A) and 8(b)(2). [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 2:54 am
The County opposed the petitions on the grounds that 1) SMARA does not apply; 2) if SMARA applies, the Ordinance Opponents have failed to show prejudice from the failure to comply; and 3) the ordinance is exempt from CEQA. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 6:30 am
Kessler’s agreement, meanwhile, (Exhibit 10.3 to the 8-K) does (as was reported) pay him a $1.2 million annual salary and a $1 million signing bonus. [read post]
