Search for: "DOES 1-8"
Results 5981 - 6000
of 32,295
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Feb 2013, 11:29 am
Additionally, no Summary has been posted by OCR for any List Breach involving a BA that occurred later than February 1, 2011. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 12:00 am
The fact that many partnerships tend to have no real effect does not lessen the impact of those that do. [read post]
10 Feb 2019, 11:42 am
Id. at *8. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 6:11 pm
It does not ban unsolicited commercial email outright. [read post]
24 Nov 2019, 6:52 am
In particular, a likelihood of confusion within the meaning of Article 8(1)(b) EUTMR could be established if the goods in question were regarded as identical. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 2:15 pm
Note that Reese’s Law also provides labeling requirements for the packaging of button cell and coin batteries themselves, which the UL 4200A-23 standard does not address. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 9:07 am
There does not appear to be anything unusual or improper about sending that from a private email account. [read post]
4 Sep 2017, 3:08 pm
1. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 7:32 am
§§ 157, 158(a)(1). [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 10:02 am
Furtive movements 8. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 11:58 pm
Claim 1 of the ’685 patent recites:A fusion protein, comprising (...) and Hubbell is a named inventor.The legal issue turns on: It is undisputed that, although the ’509 applicationand the ’685 patent have two inventors in common –Hubbell and Schense – they do not have identical inventiveentities and have neither common owners norcommon assignees.Further relevant details come from the history of the '509:The ’509 application is a continuation of… [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 7:11 am
Philip Havers QC of 1 Crown Office represented Martin in this case. [read post]
5 May 2019, 10:39 am
The questions posed are whether the White Paper demonstrates sufficient certainty and precision in respect of each of the following matters.1. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 12:38 pm
Does, 2013 WL 1907059. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 12:38 pm
Does, 2013 WL 1907059. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 3:01 pm
First of all, as regards the invention defined in the present claims, the description explains in detail the different aspects of the steps of the invention […] and also illustrates with reference to Figures 5 to 8 an example of implementation of the claimed invention; the description therefore does provide a sufficiently detailed description of at least one way of carrying out the presently claimed invention, using examples and referring to the drawings as stipulated by R… [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 2:41 pm
Patry, Copyright §3:151, p. 3-485 (2016)). [8] Id. at 8. [9] Id. at 5. [10] Id. at 7. [11] Id. [12] Id. at 10. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 2:41 pm
Patry, Copyright §3:151, p. 3-485 (2016)). [8] Id. at 8. [9] Id. at 5. [10] Id. at 7. [11] Id. [12] Id. at 10. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 2:08 pm
[8] Id [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 10:26 pm
The law is clear that affidavits are not admissible at trial.[1] Defendant accordingly objects to all portions of Alphabet's affidavit that purport to adduce facts about the case. [read post]
