Search for: "Does 1 - 20" Results 5981 - 6000 of 28,814
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2011, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
In R (SK Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2009] 1 WLR 1527  the Court of Appeal appears to suggest that not every type of public law breach, committed after an initially valid detention, would render continued detention unlawful. [read post]
15 Jul 2021, 4:20 am by SHG
” After 20 paragraphs of explaining the first Jim Crow, Blow concludes in his final four grafs that it’s Biden and the Dems in Washington enabling the return of Jim Crow. [read post]
3 Aug 2021, 1:00 pm
Based Sectors in China: What Role Does International Investment Law Play? [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 4:50 am by Xandra Kramer
Only under special circumstances does Article V(1)(e) NYC not prevent the court from using the margin of discretion to recognise or grant enforcement of annulled foreign arbitral awards. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 1:17 am by Adam Wagner
But it must also try to ensure that it does not undermine its own authority by imposing too much, too fast. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 1:31 pm by Gabriel Schoenfeld
In plain black letters the statute reads (with my emphasis): 18 USC 1512(c) Whoever corruptly— (1) alters, destroys, mutilates, or conceals a record, document, or other object, or attempts to do so, with the intent to impair the object’s integrity or availability for use in an official proceeding; or (2) otherwise obstructs, influences, or impedes any official proceeding, or attempts to do so, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or… [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 1:55 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Here's the latest complaint, this one filed against Twitter in the Southern District of New York:   Cain Et Al, No 1 17 Cv 00122 (S D N Y Jan 08, 2017), COMPLAINT Against Twitter, Inc (2) (PDF)Cain Et Al, No 1 17 Cv 00122 (S D N Y Jan 08, 2017), COMPLAINT Against Twitter, Inc (2) (Text) I don't have a lot new to say about this issue in light of this latest complaint. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 12:59 am
Art. 25(1) of the Fundamental Law does not foresee any exceptions to the principle that Hungarian courts are to administer all domestic civil lawsuits. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 10:22 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  The initial proposed settlement provided for: (1) $20 worth of e-gift certificates for each of the class members; (2) $250,000 in cy pres awards; and (3) up to $175,000 in plaintiff’s attorney’s fees with a “clear sailing” provision attached. [read post]
23 May 2012, 7:58 pm by Charles Sartain
But a general release does not express an intention to waive fraudulent inducement claims. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 7:50 am by Matthias Weller
AG Szpunar proposed (paras. 65 et seq.) that the Court should answer the question referred for a preliminary ruling by the Tribunal da Relação de Guimarães (Court of Appeal, Guimarães, Portugal) as follows: Article 3(1), first and fourth subparagraphs, of Regulation (EC) 2015/848 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 2015 on insolvency proceedings must be interpreted as meaning that the presumption that the habitual residence… [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 8:18 am by Raymond Millien
§ 112, ¶ 1. [3] Id. at 29 (internal citations omitted). [4] Id. at 24 (internal citations omitted). [5] Id. at 20 (internal citations omitted). [6] Id. at 28 (internal citations omitted). [read post]