Search for: "Does 1 - 29" Results 5981 - 6000 of 13,863
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2017, 12:43 am by Sander van Rijnswou
Differences over document D23.1 Document D2 was taken as the closest prior art in the the contested decision.The analysis of the difference over document D2 in the contested decision is based on features which are no longer present in claim 1, and therefore does not need to be discussed here.3.2 Document D2 discloses a system for dispensing beverages in which a typical interaction between a customer ("Frank") and the system is set out in Example 6 (page 29). [read post]
6 May 2017, 12:00 am by Robert L. Mues
How Does The New Shared Parenting Law Signed In Kentucky Impact Ohio? [read post]
4 May 2017, 11:12 pm by Kluwer Blogger
Top 3 Kluwer Trademark Blog posts of March/April 1) Riding on the coat-tails of Pandora – what is acceptable in Denmark? [read post]
3 May 2017, 6:55 am by Joy Waltemath
On May 1, the House Appropriations Committee released the fiscal year 2017 Omnibus Appropriations bill aimed at providing discretionary funding for the federal government for the current fiscal year. [read post]
2 May 2017, 4:30 pm by EEM
"Does Cooperating with ICE Harm Local Police? [read post]
2 May 2017, 3:42 am by Sander van Rijnswou
 The appeal board does not side with the unlucky second party; for transfers it is first come first serve. [read post]
1 May 2017, 12:18 pm
The jury reached a verdict on July 29. . . .Tanubagijo moved for a new trial pursuant to section 1181, subdivision (3), arguing P.D. [read post]
Here, however, we want to consider a higher-altitude, more speculative question: What does it all mean? [read post]
1 May 2017, 7:48 am by Howard Knopf
The Ontario Superior Court, unlike the Federal Court, does not provide an online docket, which usually gives some idea of what it happening in a case. [read post]
1 May 2017, 7:48 am by Howard Knopf
The Ontario Superior Court, unlike the Federal Court, does not provide an online docket, which usually gives some idea of what it happening in a case. [read post]
30 Apr 2017, 4:29 pm by INFORRM
  Lachaux v Independent Print, heard 29 and 30 November and 1 December 2016 (Macfarlane, Davis and Sharp LJJ). [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 10:33 am by Jenny Gesley
Used under Creative Commons License, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/. 1. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 6:24 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
., GEORGE TSIMOYIANIS, and JOHN DOES 1-100, the actual names ofsuch individuals or entities being unknown, Defendants. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 6:24 am
Artistic judgment and marketabilityThere was an argument that the test for identifying an artistic work should include two objective components:(1) do the design elements reflect the designer's artistic judgment? [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 3:46 am
3)      Should Article 5 of the [InfoSoc] Directive (Directive 2001/29/EC) be interpreted as meaning that there is no “lawful use” within the meaning of Article 5(1)(b) of that Directive if a temporary reproduction is made by an end user during the streaming of a copyright-protected work from a third-party website where that copyright-protected work is offered without the authorisation of the right holder(s)? [read post]