Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 5981 - 6000
of 7,359
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2009, 7:23 pm
(Washington State Patent Law Blog) US Patents US Commerce Secretary Locke on patents (Intellectual Property Watch) Innovation with lead recovery if patent system allows (IP Watchdog) ‘Judicial Business of the United States Courts’ report – only 3.8% of all patent cases reach court stage (Innovationpartners) Did you know... existing English language translations of documents must be produces during discovery at the ITC? [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 9:01 pm
The leading case involved an opera singer.In the 1852 English decision of Lumley v. [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 8:53 pm
The types of format-related accommodations currently provided include: Unified English Braille (UEB) version of the LSAT Large print (e.g., 18-point font or higher) test book Screen-readable HTML test (including, where applicable, use of screen-reader software (e.g., JAWS)) Alternate non-Scantron answer sheet Marking answer choices in the test book Use of line marker Use of magnification devices (e.g., magnification reading glasses, handheld video magnifier, closed-circuit television… [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 7:15 am
-Frankfort v. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 7:15 am
-Frankfort v. [read post]
23 Mar 2024, 11:29 am
The Council of Europe will bear the travel and subsistence expenses of one representative from each member State (two in the case of the state whose representative has been elected Chair). [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 5:50 am
However, significant concerns persist around whether the confiscation of State-linked assets would be compliant with domestic and international laws relating to State immunity. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 7:20 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: US CAFC: Continuation limits invalid; limits on claims and RCEs are ok: Tafas v Doll (Patently-O) (Law360) (Hal Wegner) (IAM) (Patent Baristas) (Promote the Progress) (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (IP Spotlight) (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Anticipate This!) [read post]
18 Nov 2007, 9:08 pm
Cal. 2005); Viacom International v. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 11:52 pm
The result of the decision was to reject both the substantial purpose test previously adhered to by the English Court of Appeal and the sole purpose test which by then had been adopted by the majority of the Australian High Court in Grant v. [read post]
26 Nov 2010, 11:59 am
The factual background in Starglade Properties v. [read post]
4 May 2010, 8:21 am
Campbell v. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 12:29 am
Brands, LLC v. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 2:38 pm
There has also been some commentary on Hirsi Jamaa and Others v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 10:36 am
V. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 7:48 am
The decision of the English Court of Appeal in Sulamerica CIA Nacional de Seugros S.A. v. [read post]
15 May 2022, 12:25 am
There is a press release in English here. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 1:13 pm
In Tanzin v. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 6:26 am
After Brown v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 12:51 am
D.P.P. v. [read post]
