Search for: "In Re: Designation of Judges" Results 5981 - 6000 of 9,823
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Feb 2013, 9:34 am by Eric Miller
  Furthermore, these studies are not likely to be cited even if the judges read them unless the judge actually publishes. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 11:48 am by Scott A. Schaefers
  Between 1993 and 2005, Wabtec designed brake systems under a license agreement with its sister company, SAB Wabco. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 4:30 am by Steve McConnell
Feb. 4, 2013), Judge McLaughlin authored an insightful opinion showing how context and doctor choice are relevant to a claim of design defect. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 12:22 pm by Lebowitz & Mzhen
The district judge later reduced the award to $1.5 million, and an appeal by Merck is still pending. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 11:39 am by Eric
If you're an academic and interested in coming to the DMCA conference, note that the next day (March 16) we're having an Internet Law academic work-in-progress conference. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 2:12 pm by Steve Vladeck
., footnote 19 of the FISA Court of Review’s 2002 decision in In re Sealed Case). [read post]
8 Feb 2013, 8:22 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
The de Lajarte case was cited in the obviousness case In re Dillon, 919 F.2d 688 (CAFC 1990) within the dissent by Judge Newman :In In re De Lajarte, 52 C.C.P.A. 826, 337 F.2d 870, 143 USPQ 256 (CCPA 1964) the same principle was applied to a new composition. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 9:20 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
While Arris found such accusations sufficient for declaratory judgment jurisdiction in a suit brought by a supplier, Arris did not set forth an overarching test for a supplier’s standing to seek a declaratory judgment re- garding its potential indirect infringement liability; rather, it identified circumstances that have been held sufficient (rather than necessary) for declaratory judg- ment jurisdiction. 639 F.3d at 1375. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 2:49 pm
On appeal, the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM upheld the decision concerning the applicability of Article 7(1)(b) and (c), but remitted the case to the Examination Division for re-examination of the applicability of Article 7(3). [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 6:52 am by Matthew C. Bouchard, Esq.
Whether you’re a design professional or a building contractor, your lien rights depend on whether you perform services on any given project under one contract or under multiple contracts. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 7:18 am by Kevin Smith, J.D.
  Judge Evans specifically found that the e-reserves at GSU were not transformative, and that is a point that the Appeals Court should re-examine carefully. [read post]
2 Feb 2013, 2:19 pm by Jack Pringle
  Dunes West's ClaimsEqual Protection"I think this place is restricted Wang, so don't tell 'em you're Jewish. [read post]