Search for: "Line v. Line" Results 5981 - 6000 of 45,549
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2016, 4:51 am by Rob McKinney
The bottom line is once you violate the law you begin a target for a follow up visit. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 1:34 am by Dr Jeremias Prassl
Lord Toulson then turned to a second line of argument, first developed by the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in King v American Airlines. [read post]
28 Jul 2007, 7:50 am
Jeff Parrott of the South Bend Tribune writes today about the Supreme Court's decision Thursday to grant transfer in the case of Sophia Willis v. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Further, as the count noted in Alcalde v Riley, 73 AD3d 1101, GML §205-a “largely abolished the former so-called ‘firefighter's rule’ by giving firefighters [and police officers] a cause of action in negligence for injuries suffered while in the line of duty except as to actions against municipal employers and fellow workers. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 5:43 am
This decision, at paras 37 to 47, also brings UK law more closely in line with equivalent Bundesgerichtshof (German Supreme Court) case law including Schütz v Mauser (Pallet Container II) Case X ZR 97/11, in July 2012 [by pure coincidence, a full English translation of this ruling was published in the January 2013 issue of JIPLP]. [read post]