Search for: "Marks v. State "
Results 5981 - 6000
of 21,692
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Nov 2018, 11:53 am
In Justice v. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 7:32 pm
Erickson, “Interpretation of recurring weak associations obtained from epidemiologic studies of suspected human teratogens,” 46 Teratology 69 (1992); Mark Parascandola, Douglas L Weed & Abhijit Dasgupta, “Two Surgeon General’s reports on smoking and cancer: a historical investigation of the practice of causal inference,” 3 Emerging Themes in Epidemiol. 1 (2006); David Sackett, R. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 3:00 pm
United States, 490 U.S. 858, 873-74 (1989); see also Fed. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 1:49 am
Whether one agrees or not with the analysis of the ECtHR in either case, both might be helpful when it comes to interpreting public policy/morality exclusions in IP law, especially with regard to trade mark applications and copyright enforcement.With regard to trade marks, the test advanced by the ECThR in E.S. v Austria appears in line with the one that the Appointed Person has suggested for UK trade mark applications. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 9:38 am
Surreptitiously mark overvotes on ballots marked for the candidate you don’t like. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 4:20 am
” [See Wallis v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 10:04 am
”13 Mandatory Not Precatory The better reasoned cases decided under Federal Rule of Evidence 702, and state-court analogues, follow the Reference Manual in making clear that confounding factors must be carefully addressed and eliminated. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 12:49 pm
Criminal procedure — Post-conviction relief — Abuse of discretion The State of Maryland, appellant, appeals the post-conviction order of the Circuit Court for Harford County that granted Mark Edmund Christian, II, appellee, a new trial. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 9:14 am
Because of the state action doctrine, they are generally assumed to be unconstrained by the First Amendment. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 8:00 am
Magliocca makes a good case for why such appeals to fixity were likely unavoidable in the United States. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 6:00 am
In Sorrell v. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 3:50 am
For the ABA Journal, Mark Walsh previews Frank v. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 8:21 pm
An example of this use is AMERICAN GIRL for shoes, see Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 10:59 am
A case arising from the First Circuit, Mission Product Holdings, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 5:58 am
Flanders v. [read post]
28 Oct 2018, 5:09 pm
Mark Pearson has posted on the Journlaw blog analysing, comments by President Trump on social media and their propensity to make Twitter an “echo chamber”. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 8:42 am
” First, in the 1929 case United States v. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 7:13 am
Many people across the world are familiar with Obelix, a beloved character in the French comic book series ‘Asterix’, who fell into a cauldron of magic potion as a baby and as a result is in a permanent state of superhuman strength. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 4:29 am
” At Lawfare, Ingrid Wuerth cautions that, when the court decides Jam v. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 4:33 pm
John Reed Stark Most readers are undoubtedly familiar with the concept of “insider trading” – that is, the purchase or sale by company insiders of their personal holdings in company shares based on material non-public information. [read post]
