Search for: "Matter of Mark T."
Results 5981 - 6000
of 16,584
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jul 2017, 1:30 am
Mark Holmes, Sally C. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 9:30 pm
" --Kevin T. [read post]
4 Jul 2017, 1:19 pm
It doesn’t really matter, of course, because the Declaration itself has absolutely zero legal significance. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 6:13 am
You pick it up, it’s an urgent matter, and when you hang up you proceed to work on the urgent matter. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 5:07 am
"].July 26, 2017 - 11 AM: In re Iron Hill Brewery, LLC, Serial No. 86684857 [Section 2(d) refusal of CRUSHER for "beer" in view of the registered mark THE CRUSHER for "wines"].July 26, 2017 - 2 PM: In re Handbag Republic Inc., Serial No. 86760580 [Section 2(d) refusal of TWENTY NINE for "handbags" in view of the registered mark 29 (Stylized) for "book bags, backpacks, duffle bags and tote bags"].July 27, 2017 - 2 PM: In re… [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 8:40 pm
”); id. at 2605 (“[T]he State laws challenged by Petitioners in these cases are now held invalid to the extent they exclude same-sex couples from civil marriage on the same terms and conditions as opposite-sex couples. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 2:23 am
I Marks misleading the public on the paternity of copyright works are fraudulent - say French Supreme Court I Should the court be indifferent to consumer indifference regarding the mark? [read post]
1 Jul 2017, 12:00 pm
This new position marks a decisive break from the more conscientious approach long espoused by both the Comptroller General and the Office of Legal Counsel (OLC). [read post]
1 Jul 2017, 8:24 am
Spokespersons for Nike and Gronkowski have said they wish to resolve the matter without a legal battle. [read post]
1 Jul 2017, 12:00 am
I Marks misleading the public on the paternity of copyright works are fraudulent - say French Supreme Court I Should the court be indifferent to consumer indifference regarding the mark? [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 9:22 am
"Ariad, 598 F .3d at 1351 (internal brackets and quotation marks omitted). [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 6:18 am
"Unfortunately a copy of the decision isn't yet available online, but the IPKat will update the post once it is made available. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 6:18 am
"Unfortunately a copy of the decision isn't yet available online, but the IPKat will update the post once it is made available. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 11:29 am
Indeed, it could mark a setback. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 5:35 am
The Board observed that [t]here is no fixed rule for the amount of proof necessary to demonstrate acquired distinctiveness; however, the burden is heavier for product configurations. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 1:03 pm
The Times runs through what we know and don’t yet know about the malware. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 10:01 am
If the statute has certain factors in it, and it doesn’t have other factors in it, and the court considers extraneous matters, isn’t that subject to appellate review? [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 3:04 am
The Supreme Court didn’t take an appeal from the state in 2014. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 11:15 am
Between the fifth and sixth year, you need to file new forms to prove you are still using the mark. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 9:02 pm
"SCOTUS Splits the Travel Ban Baby: The Supreme Court's ruling doesn't make much sense as a matter of law; That may be good for Donald Trump. [read post]
