Search for: "Matter of Rules Adoption" Results 5981 - 6000 of 22,051
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2019, 11:01 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Right wing libertarians think that only physical harm matters and only harms to people with entitlements to property matter, but she considers more kinds of harm relevant.Foreseeability is a big issue with harm. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 2:55 pm by JB
Indeed, they want to show that the adopters did not merely wish to ban caste and class legislation against blacks; in their view, the adopters meant to ban all caste and class legislation, no matter at whom it was directed. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 8:41 am by Theodore R. Flo
”  In reaching this conclusion, the Court adopted the reasoning of the panel decision of the D.C. [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 9:11 pm by Dan Flynn
Iowa’s first “ag-gag” law, adopted in 2012, was invalidated by a federal court in January. [read post]
18 Dec 2021, 2:13 am by Stephen Pitel
A new section on subject matter competence dealing with the foreign immovable property rules (s. 12.2); 3. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 9:26 pm by Patricia Salkin
 In the Matter of Administrative Appeal Garry Ehlebracht, 2022 WL 3097464 (SD 8/3/2022) [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 4:00 am by Administrator
In this matter the TTC has not indicated what its availability is to commence these arbitration proceedings. [read post]
29 Jan 2007, 2:17 am
(My apologies for not posting this in a more timely manner--I've been tied up with other matters.) [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 5:25 am
”  Exxon Mobil sought to omit the proposal under Rule 14a-8(i)(7) arguing that this pertained to a matter of the ordinary business of the corporation but the staff of the Commission declined to issue the requisite no action request. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 5:29 am
Virtually every circuit has adopted a form of the so-called "sham affidavit rule," which precludes a party from creating an issue of material fact by contradicting prior sworn testimony unless the "shifting party can offer persuasive reasons for believing the supposed correction" is more accurate than the prior testimony. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 2:33 pm by Louis Leichter
 Thus, if the Legislature did not give them the power to regulate a particular activity, the Boards generally cannot expand their jurisdiction to regulate that activity by adopting an administrative rule. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 8:40 am by JB
Recently Jamal Greene has argued that judges often use originalist arguments whenever they are construing a piece of constitutional text that looks to them like a rule but is ambiguous. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 4:00 am by Jennifer Daskal, Peter Swire
” This statement of overall opposition to the approach of the CLOUD Act is significant: It would appear to persist no matter how many privacy-related enhancements were added to the bill. [read post]