Search for: "Matter of Smith" Results 5981 - 6000 of 9,879
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Dec 2013, 12:02 pm
Smith & Nephew, Inc., No. 13 C 1850, slip op. [read post]
14 Apr 2022, 1:52 am by Jack Bogdanski
He was eight months old at the time.Anyway, while all the flap about Flynn and his backers is interesting, it really only matters to the extent it sways the voters of the new district one way or the other. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 2:57 pm by John J. Sullivan
This post is from the Dechert half of the blog as the Reed Smith team is involved in this litigation. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 7:19 am by John Jascob
Clients can expect long delays when dealing with government agencies, even on routine matters, he noted. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 12:00 am
Money matters in the defense of those accused of a crime. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 11:08 am by David Greene
U.S. courts have consistently held that the First Amendment’s protections for expression, petition, and assembly necessarily also protect the rights of individuals to gather information to fuel those expressions, petitions, and assemblies.As we explained in the brief:"In the United States, a right to de-reference publicly available information on data protection grounds would be unconstitutional: the First Amendment to the US Constitution guarantees the right of people to publish… [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
Field's demand was postponed for a month; when the ABCNY next met, the judiciary committee washed its hands of the matter. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 1:29 am
 Just the previous week Lord Justice Floyd, who gave the leading judgment in this decision, gave the Herschel Smith Lecture. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 1:13 pm
Today we have this guest post from Reed Smith's Andrew Stillufsen about a recent defense win in a third party payer (or is it"payor"?) [read post]
10 Apr 2025, 2:56 am by Oliver Fairhurst
Is this a reflection of complicated cases being heard within the strictures of the IPEC, a Court of Appeal that is more willing to grant permission, the lack of ability to refer matters to the CJEU, or something else? [read post]
2 Mar 2014, 4:01 am by Ben
Randy Smith, accused the panel's majority of writing new law saying "We have never held that an actress' performance could be copyrightable" but the majority held that "An actor's performance, when fixed, is copyrightable if it evinces 'some minimal degree of creativity ... no matter how crude, humble or obvious it might be" adding  "That is true whether the actor speaks, is dubbed over or, like Buster Keaton, performs without any words at all." [read post]