Search for: "State v House" Results 5981 - 6000 of 28,332
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jun 2020, 8:15 am by John Elwood
Texas and United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 1:40 pm by Giles Peaker
Croydon London Borough Council v Kalonga (2020) EWHC 1353 (QB) Flexible tenancies. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 11:56 am by Mukarrum Ahmed
He appeared in the House of Lords in Ruxley Electronics and Construction Ltd v Forsyth on the measure of damages for defective construction and has acted as consultant to many clients, owners, contractors and consultants on commercial and construction law. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 10:35 am by Schachtman
Federal and State Prosecutions against Physicians and Screening Companies After Judge Jack’s exposé of fraudulent and false diagnoses in the silicosis MDL, various news media reported that the United States Attorney’s office in the Southern District of New York was investigating possible criminal charges against the physicians and lawyers who orchestrated the screenings. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 8:03 am by Mark Movsesian
] Last weekend, the Supreme Court rejected a California church's application for a temporary injunction against enforcement of a state public-health order limiting attendance at houses of worship (South Bay United Pentecostal Church v. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 9:09 pm by Corynne McSherry
We filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request with the White House’s Office of Science and Technology Policy for those complaints last year and wer told that that office had no records (https://www.eff.org/document/eff-fioa-request-tech-bias-story-sharing-tool).Section 5 commands the Attorney General to convene a group to look at existing state laws and propose model state legislation to address unfair and deceptive practices by online platforms. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 2:19 pm by Corynne McSherry
The Office also suggests the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Lenz v Universal Music was mistaken. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 7:44 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (on the application of Pathan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12 December 2019. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 5:48 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Further, the trust beneficiaries have no standing to sue regarding property that was in the trusts (see Matter of Larchmont Pancake House v Board of Assessors and/or Assessors of the Town of Mamaroneck, 33 NY3d 228, 240 [2019]; Buechel v Bain, 275 AD2d 65, 65 [1st Dept 2000]). [read post]
31 May 2020, 4:22 pm by INFORRM
Surveillance CNBC had a piece “House Democrats withdraw foreign surveillance bill as Trump veto pledge threatens passage”. [read post]
31 May 2020, 3:55 pm by Larry
In reality, the language is taken from In Zone Brands v. [read post]