Search for: "State v. Billings"
Results 5981 - 6000
of 19,726
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Aug 2012, 12:26 pm
Article I, section 9 of the United States Constitution states in relevant part that “[n]o Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed,” and, in its opinion in Calder v. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 10:56 am
The Washington, DC gun control case, District of Columbia v. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 5:00 am
Dennis v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 1:44 am
The test for determining such an issue was recently authoritatively stated by the Supreme Court in the case of McInnes v HM Advocate 2010 SLT 266. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 6:09 am
The New York Times reports that Democrats in Congress have introduced a bill to undo the Court ruling last June in Gross v. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 6:02 am
By Sara Hutchins Jodka In Burns v. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 9:38 am
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani] Tamburo v. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 2:17 pm
[See CTV News Story here and decision in Working Families Coalition (Canada) Inc. v. [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 11:05 pm
The Bill is an avatar of the same. [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 8:12 pm
Quebec (Attorney General), and Trinity Western University v. [read post]
25 Nov 2018, 1:09 pm
The case is Boyden et al v Conlin et al. [read post]
4 Jan 2022, 10:18 am
Senate Bill S7093 amends the New York state court rules of evidence by adding CPLR § 4549 to permit the admission of an opposing party's statement if made by an agent or employee made within the scope of that relationship and during the existence of that relationship. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 8:01 am
The case was Lewis v. [read post]
4 May 2010, 4:21 am
Although Education Law Section 3020-a 3 c(iii)(C) states that an administrator or teacher has the right to demand a "bill of particulars" concerning the charges and specifications filed against him or her, no similar provision is included in Section 75 of the Civil Service Law. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 8:30 pm
(By the way Bill, 4 is not the record for a single day, on 30 Sep 2005 for instance, CAAF decided 6 cases and I suspect that CAAF has done more on previous end-of-term days).United States v. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 7:12 pm
The bill also empowers the executive branch to identify and similarly ban other apps that are owned by foreign adversaries.As stated in the House Report that accompanied the so-called "Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act," the law is needed in part because members of Congress fear the Chinese government “push[es] misinformation, disinformation, and propaganda on the American public” through the platform. [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 7:34 am
United States Subscription RequiredU.S. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 10:20 am
Ct. 1101 (2015) and FTC v. [read post]
12 Nov 2018, 10:22 am
by Dennis Crouch LG Electronics v. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 12:43 pm
The bill states that the rules remain the same as they have been since 1993 (as expressly embraced by the Industrial Welfare Commission in 2000). [read post]
