Search for: "US v. Levelle Grant"
Results 5981 - 6000
of 9,108
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jan 2013, 11:30 am
(See EEOC v. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 9:54 am
Horton, striking down the use of class action waivers as unfair labor practices. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 3:15 pm
The People cited the case of People v McDermott which was decided in 1994. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 11:46 am
Armstrong World Industries, 839 F.2d 1121 (5th Cir. 1988) (affirming grant of summary judgment on grounds that statistical correlation between asbestos exposure and disease did not support specific causation) Thompson v. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 7:40 pm
It is sometimes suggested that the Supreme Court’s 1920 decision in Missouri v. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 11:43 pm
Petitioner also applied the Supreme Court’s Mayo Collaborative Services v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 12:57 pm
In this rule, the EPA established Significant Impact Levels (SILs) and a Significant Monitoring Concentration (SMC) for PM2.5, screening tools the EPA uses to determine whether a new source may be exempted from certain requirements under § 165 of the Act, 42 U.S.C. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 10:26 am
If the Federal Circuit grants the motion for leave, Apple's six-page brief, which was filed along with the motion, will become part of the record. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 5:30 am
Supreme Court granted UUP’s petition to confirm the arbitrator’s award in its entirely [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
In a 1950 California case, State Employees’ Retirement System v. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 3:08 pm
In the case of People v. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 11:16 am
The court subsequently granted partial summary judgment on Allflex's inequitable conduct claim, holding that Avid's failure to disclose information about prior public use and an offer of sale was material. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 1:39 am
It used to be that years would pass between Supreme Court cases considering securities law issues. [read post]
19 Jan 2013, 9:37 am
Osmo-dehydration is quite a useful technology in this regard. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 3:13 pm
It concluded that the first amended compliant satisfied the pleading standards required by the US Supreme Court’s rulings in Bell Atlantic Corp v Twombly, Ashcroft v Iqbal, and their progeny , and thus, should not have been dismissed. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:56 pm
He used that initial access to begin his bulk download of the JSTOR corpus. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:56 pm
He used that initial access to begin his bulk download of the JSTOR corpus. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 9:17 am
Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 8:51 am
Would a grant of exclusive rights encourage markets or not? [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 8:05 am
” Just as the district court in Perry granted the sponsors of the Proposition 8 initiative a right to intervene, so, too, the district court in Windsor granted BLAG’s motion to intervene to defend the constitutionality of Section 3 of DOMA. [read post]
