Search for: "United States v. Choice"
Results 5981 - 6000
of 6,504
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Mar 2019, 7:31 am
Congressman, is leading a group of states defending the ACA and is challenging the ruling in the U.S. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 7:30 am
In Stenberg v. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm
Other effective choices are hard to imagine given current numbers. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 2:48 pm
Laird and Marbury v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 2:46 am
” Winters v. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 5:50 am
He saw a United States in turmoil after the January 6th Capitol attack, under former President Donald Trump. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
Section 4 of the Fourteenth Amendment states that “[t]he validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. [read post]
2 May 2016, 9:02 pm
As Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote in United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 12:00 am
Other federal banking regulators, as well as most state regulators, also require universal fidelity coverage. [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 1:24 pm
., appeal the decision of the United States DistrictCourt for the District of Delaware invalidating all assertedclaims of patents directed to COPAXONE® 40mg/mL, aproduct marketed for treatment of patients with relapsingforms of multiple sclerosis. [read post]
22 Mar 2014, 5:16 am
” Roe v. [read post]
21 Sep 2013, 4:00 am
Yesterday I attended a Samsung v. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 2:54 pm
United States stated: ""Nor can we perceive any reason for not considering the expression 'the validity of the public debt' as embracing whatever concerns the integrity of the public obligations. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 8:43 am
Porro v. [read post]
4 May 2012, 3:13 am
The states’ leadership had changed from Democratic to Republican. [read post]
14 Jul 2022, 6:04 am
In A.P. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2024, 6:06 am
The inability of these intransigents to agree on how to implement the Court’s first such decision in 2009 in Sejdić and Finci v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 7:07 am
Indeed, at least some of the Justices appeared to acknowledge that if Congress had reworded the statute to impose the exact same choice but through a different formulation of words--for example, by inverting the order of the subsections, so that 5000A(a) required everyone to make a shared responsibility payment to the IRS, and 5000A(b) then exempted from that obligation anyone who maintains health insurance--it would be plainly constitutional.For this and other reasons, my sense from the… [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:59 pm
Brown and David Matusow, Bahr, et al. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 8:14 pm
Firstly, the case of Yong Vui Kong drew more attention towards the flaws of the laws administering the death penalty, most particularly in relation to how it unfairly targets vulnerable communities: members of the public and leaders questioned the injustice that was meted out against innocent drug mules and carriers, especially since these individuals often came from poor socioeconomic backgrounds and had no choice but to turn to such trade in order to sustain themselves, or their family. [read post]
