Search for: "University System v. State" Results 5981 - 6000 of 8,144
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Feb 2012, 7:55 am
    Alabama's football helmet In a statement, university spokeswoman Deborah Lane stated that :  “The University of Alabama believes the court ruled correctly when it found that Daniel Moore and his company engaged in activities that infringe on the University’s trademarks. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 4:05 pm by Blogspot
The States Parties to the present Covenant,Considering that, in accordance with the principles proclaimed in the Charter of the United Nations, recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world, Recognizing that these rights derive from the inherent dignity of the human person, Recognizing that, in accordance with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the… [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 3:47 pm by Jonathan Zasloff
I ran into this dilemma the other day when discussing the classic case of Moore v. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 9:15 am by SteinMcewen, LLP
§ 273(c) states that commercial use includes FDA reviews of drug applications, as well as non-commercial use in “nonprofit” or university laboratory “for which the public is the intended beneficiary. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 4:24 pm by Bridget Crawford
CFP: ClassCrits V November 16-17, 2012 CALL FOR PAPERS & PARTICIPATION ClassCrits V  From Madison to Zuccotti Park: Confronting Class and Reclaiming the American Dream  Sponsored by University of Wisconsin Law School & The Institute for Legal Studies, University of Wisconsin Law School  Madison, WI. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 5:23 pm by Adam Wagner
However, the Green Paper “gives no voice to the misgivings concerning any system of secret justice that are regularly expressed by some of those who work in the system”. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 2:17 pm by Steve Bainbridge
There was thus from the earliest times a well organized system of providing for the various forms of suffering; but it was necessarily limited and dependent on private endeavour so long as the Christians were under the ban of a hostile State. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 2:21 pm by Soroush Seifi
 In distinguishing Windisman[28], Winkler J. had stated that in Sutherland the work of the RP was unnecessary to the preparation or presentation of the case. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
Scarlet Extended SA v SABAM Case C-70/10, 24 November 2011, concerned Scarlet’s (an internet service provider) refusal to install a system for filtering electronic communications which use file-sharing software in order to prevent any file sharing which would infringe copyright. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 2:43 pm by Pace Law School Library
  State regulation of air pollution fromoffshore ships is upheld in PacificMerchant Shipping Ass’n v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 2:34 am by SHG
The first time the words appeared, it was in an amicus brief filed in Williams v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 11:12 am by Christopher Danzig
Yesterday, the Supreme Court handed down its opinion in United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 7:00 am by Harvard International Law Journal
(iii) Flexibility v. checks and balances Heller’s justification for the turn to a ‘sentencing heuristic’ is founded on the overall assumption that (even) wider flexibility for States to investigate and prosecute might create better compliance. [read post]