Search for: "Banks v. State" Results 6001 - 6020 of 15,806
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Apr 2016, 6:00 am by Administrator
Although the court in R v Jenkins upheld the constitutionality of conducting an ex parte trial when there is a risk of incarceration, the circumstances were quite different than those in Banks. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 12:00 am by Giesela Ruehl
In this context, he discusses two recent cases, Goldman Sachs International v Novo Banco SA [2015] EWHC 2371 (Comm), and BayernLB v Hypo Alpe Adria (HETA case) Regional Court, Munich I, judgment of 8 May 2015, that have dealt with the recognition of foreign resolution acts. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 4:55 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  This month, news also broke concerning the law firm data breach surrounding the so-called Panama Papers, thus far involving more than 11.5 million documents detailing how hundreds of wealthy people hid money in offshore banks and investments to avoid paying taxes, causing international headlines, a presidential resignation and celebrity embarrassment. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 11:00 pm by John Ehrett
Hamilton Bank of Johnson City barring property owners from filing a federal takings claim in federal court until they exhaust state court remedies, when this rule results in numerous jurisdictional “anomalies” and has a “dramatic” negative impact on takings law under San Remo Hotel, L.P. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 3:00 am by Matthew Wentworth-May
Lord Sumption rejected this, stating that the directives leave various matters to member states to determine, but the domestic schemes were nonetheless part of a scheme for implementing an EU tax. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 8:00 pm by John Ehrett
The petition of the day is: Fitch Ratings, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 3:52 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  ***************************   The Florida First District Court of Appeal, in Durant v. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 4:00 pm
 You don't give full faith and credit to a default judgment in a sister state that recites that there's personal jurisdiction there. [read post]