Search for: "In Re Opinions of the Justices" Results 6001 - 6020 of 12,665
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2012, 3:03 pm
BETTY ANN BOWSER: The hearings have set the stage for a new round of debate in the court of public opinion. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 4:06 am by rainey Reitman
(Pamela Samuelson’s Commentary on UMG v Augusto and Vernor v Autodesk) Vernor v Autodesk (EFF Amicus Brief in Key Case re First Sale and Contracts, Following UMG v Augusto) MDY v Blizzard (Justia) A Mixed Ninth Circuit Ruling in MDY v Blizzard: WoW Buyers Are Not Owners – But Glider Users Are not Copyright Infringers (EFF’s Commentary on MDY v Blizzard) Capitol Records v ReDigi (Wikipedia) Court’s Opinion (Justia) Music Fans Aren’t Owners? [read post]
7 Sep 2009, 2:12 pm
Five justices denied federal jurisdiction over the Michigan wetland, but only four joined the majority opinion - leading to a 4-4-1 decision with Justice Kennedy and his concurring opinion proposing a "significant nexus" test forming a majority decision.In the aftermath of these two decisions challenges by the regulated community abound and the federal courts are confused as to how to apply the Rapanos opinion; with a split among the Eleventh,… [read post]
22 May 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
Policy Arguments about Judicial Fundraising Judges play an indispensible role in the administration of justice. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 12:09 pm by Anna Christensen
Two justices, Justices Stevens and Alito, do not participate in the cert. pool. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 11:34 am by Schachtman
  In re Silica Products Liab. [read post]
26 Nov 2007, 3:04 pm
Three are up for re-election next year. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 10:45 am
Honaker responded that in his personal opinion, "health" has not been defined specifically enough. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 9:30 pm by Michael S. Kang
” Understandably, no one knew exactly what to make of this confused result, without a majority opinion or a clear standard from Justice Kennedy’s concurrence. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
Courtney J recognised the difficulties that could arise with multiple third-party statements being grouped together, particularly with regard to the defence of honest opinion. [read post]
17 Jun 2007, 8:10 pm
Second, they contend that the Eleventh Circuit's rejection of their claims improperly relied on the plurality opinion in Giarratano when it should have instead relied on Justice Kennedy's narrower concurring opinion. [read post]