Search for: "In re Doe" Results 6001 - 6020 of 107,430
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Oct 2015, 11:32 pm by Sme
., August 18) (affirming denial of disability benefits)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 4:18 pm by Elie Mystal
THE FACEBOOK HEARINGS WERE AN EMBARRASSMENT TO AMERICA: And not just because Congress doesn't actually understand what Facebook is or what it does. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 5:00 pm by Howard Friedman
The Court does not doubt the significance of the region to the Kumeyaay’s religion. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 7:50 pm by Sme
., April 2, 2018) (reversing 9th Circuit and holding that service advisors are “salesm[e]n . . . primarily engaged in. . . servicing automobiles,” and they are thus exempt from the Fair Labor Standards Act’s overtime-payrequirement)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 11:47 am
" So, if you're in Texas, prayers for you and yours, and here's some potentially good news. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 2:23 pm
" But the court does note that the "frivolousness of the legal claim comes dangerously close to meriting additional sanctions. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 5:58 pm by Sme
., March 17, 2017) (reversing Commissioner denial of disability benefits because the ALJ failed to consider disorder severity and failed to order consultative examinations)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 4:48 pm by Sme
., September 29, 2016) (affirming denial of disability insurance and supplemental security income benefits) *Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 8:29 pm by Sme
., December 6, 2017) (affirming denial of visa for music director employee on Iglesia's violation of ReligiousFreedom Restoration Act claim)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 2:36 pm
With all the time they’re saving, they’ll be able to enjoy other meaningful activities such as checking out art galleries or spending time with friends. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 8:00 am by Todd Presnell
See In re Burlington Northern, Inc., 822 F.2d 518 (5th Cir. 1987). [read post]
12 Jan 2014, 2:16 pm
”That's worrisome for a number of reasons, not the least of which is the so-called "risk corridor," which is essentially a giant re-insurer or, in English, "thee and me." [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 11:31 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
”); In re Lovin, 652 F.3d1349, 1357 (Fed. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 9:00 am by Mark Keenan
It just goes to prove that social media marketing does work! [read post]