Search for: "MATTER OF A W A V" Results 6001 - 6020 of 8,375
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Oct 2011, 7:30 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
" by DavidMcLauchlan, a professor of law at the University of Wellington, discusses oneof the most important cases in the recent times on damages in contract law-Transfield Shipping Inc v. [read blog]
13 Oct 2011, 7:30 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
" by DavidMcLauchlan, a professor of law at the University of Wellington, discusses oneof the most important cases in the recent times on damages in contract law-Transfield Shipping Inc v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 4:16 am by Marie Louise
First Quality Baby Products (Patently-O) Supreme Court denies sham patent reexamination dispute: Lockwood v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 6:02 pm by Contributor
October 28th of this month will mark the one year anniversary of the publication of the Anti-SLAPP Panel’s Report to the Attorney General on anti-SLAPP legislation. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 4:37 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
First, Troy con- tends that the district court erred as a matter of law by giving two improper Allen charges, named for Allen v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 9:57 am by Peter Tillers
Marc Weber pointed out a case he was involved in: People v Pena (Joshua) 2011 NY Slip Op 21340 (Sept. 28, 2011). [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 9:50 am by Peter Tillers
Marc Weber pointed out a case he was involved in: People v Pena (Joshua) 2011 NY Slip Op 21340 (Sept. 28, 2011). [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 9:13 am by scanner1
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: DA 11-0190, 2011 MT 244, GARY MYERS, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 5:42 am by Bexis
  Here’s a copy of the opinion:  DeBoard v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 3:28 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Back when I was a summer associate at White & Case, we used to talk about SEC v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 9:39 am
SUMMARY OF LITIGATION The Supreme Court Case On August 11, 2011, the Court issued an order to show cause, which allowed the matter to proceed to hearing, and issued a stay on all aspects of ABX1 26 and 27 except for the provisions which prevent RDAs from entering into any new obligations. [read post]