Search for: "Marks v. State "
Results 6001 - 6020
of 21,692
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Apr 2018, 4:07 am
” Additional coverage of the solicitor general’s motion in United States v. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 7:24 am
United States v. [read post]
11 May 2016, 3:24 am
” In The Harvard Law Review, Robert Niles looks at “the doctrinal implications of Reed v. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 2:50 pm
Zimmerman v. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 6:28 am
” In the ABA Journal, Mark Walsh previews the upcoming Term – describing it as a “season of sequels” – with a focus on the upcoming oral argument in McCutcheon v. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 4:03 am
The first is Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 6:49 am
Ratonel et al v. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 7:12 am
Staff picks are marked by asterisks. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 9:59 pm
RT (Zimbabwe) & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWCA Civ 1285 (18 November 2010) – Read judgment The Court of Appeal has ruled that asylum seekers cannot be forced to lie about not holding political beliefs when returning to their home country. [read post]
1 Nov 2012, 1:00 am
The state’s highest court dealt with the issue of vehicle forfeiture in the recently released opinion, Laura Patino v. [read post]
1 Nov 2012, 1:00 am
The state’s highest court dealt with the issue of vehicle forfeiture in the recently released opinion, Laura Patino v. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 10:36 am
When the Supreme Court declared in Atkins v. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 7:36 am
Herring v. [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 4:32 am
[internal quotation marks omitted]). [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 4:57 am
Christian Lacroix v. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 1:59 am
It aims to establish trade mark liability in certain circumstances for online marketplaces which do not crack down on the sale of counterfeit products on their platforms.On the TTABlog, there was commentary on the standard applied by the USPTO when confronted with a sign in another language (in this case, whether MONFRÈRE FASHION is liable to be confused with MY BROTHER).PatentsThe FPC Review commented on how to interpret expressions stating a purpose in patent claim… [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 5:11 pm
In his recent December 6, 2012 decision, Judge Jonathan Mark of the Monroe County Court of Common Pleas recently granted summary judgment in favor of a ski resort in the case of Freeman v. [read post]
TTAB Vacates Prince of Wales Section 2(b) Decision and Remands Application to the Examining Attorney
21 Mar 2018, 4:06 am
Licensing Corp. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 4:17 am
Capital City, LLC v. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 6:31 pm
”).In Hasbro, Inc. v. [read post]
