Search for: "People v Long" Results 6001 - 6020 of 18,890
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Apr 2012, 4:43 am by Sergio Leal
Judge Lee Rosenthal of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas issued a ruling on March 30, 2012, issued a decision which tackled these issues in Williams v. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 10:48 am by Bill Marler
Case number is V 14-1029-1 in the Circuit Court of Benton County, Arkansas, Civil Division. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 2:05 pm by Administrator
  (Due to the lingo in other states’ laws, many people also confuse the term “Preliminary Lien” or “Pre-Lien” with “Notice to Owner”, but we’ll save that for another bLAWg topic!). [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 1:49 pm by Keith A. Davidson
Judge Noonan, writing for the United States Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, just clarified an issue on hearsay, the so-called state of mind exception, in a case titled Wagner v. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 9:35 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
One of the reasons for this is because of what doctors call the long latency period. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 12:04 pm by lawmrh
All of that may change, though, depending on the outcome of Connick v. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 9:27 am by Steve Hall
The Supreme Court established standards to assess whether severely mentally ill inmates are competent to be executed in a 1986 case, Ford v. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 8:44 pm
  Such a hearing must be held...where serious and long standing effects on the life and well-being of the child may result.'"  For an in depth discussion of guardian ad litems, court appointed attorneys for the child(ren) and the court's role in making the decisions, see Bell v. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 7:59 am by Eugene Volokh
Is there online discussion by possibly knowledgeable people about the underlying incident? [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 3:58 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
The parole authority has long been used to establish family reunification parole (FRP) processes administered by U.S. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 6:14 am
Accordingly, the government's proposal to search at the present time -- long after the 180 day period has expired -- violates Rule 41. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
I recently viewed Allen v. [read post]