Search for: "People v. Mays"
Results 6001 - 6020
of 39,685
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2012, 11:18 am
The style of the case is William Norris v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 4:30 pm
In Rosales v. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 7:32 am
See Mapp v. [read post]
20 Feb 2023, 9:00 am
Some people infected with COVID-19 may go on to experience long COVID, which can cause a wide range of health issues that can last anywhere from several weeks to even years. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 5:42 am
Some people may think that filing an appeal is an obvious option to have another shot at a more favorable judgment, but that’s not how it works. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 2:53 am
I talked about this when Cook v. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 2:53 am
I talked about this when Cook v. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 2:53 am
I talked about this when Cook v. [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm
The US Supreme Court has spoken directly on this point in Young v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 8:44 am
This noted, I still welcome opportunities to engage in dialogue with people who do not always look or think like me! [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 9:00 pm
Folkhalsomyndigheten reports about 10 people may have been infected with Salmonella after contact with small birds or sick cats. [read post]
8 May 2015, 10:23 pm
Sometimes, they may ask individuals to come down to the station or they may contact people over the phone. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 11:29 am
In Edward Mullins et al v. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 4:00 am
Once the appointing authority of an employee in the classified service has received his or her resignation, the resignation may not be withdrawn or rescinded without the approval of the appointing authorityCowin v New York State Div. of Criminal Justice Servs., 2015 NY Slip Op 08683, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentWhile employed as a Criminal Justice Program Representative 1 by the Division of Criminal Justice Services (DCJS) Thomas C. [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 3:52 pm
The use of the phrase "as may be provided by law" is not restrictive and suggests that the Supreme Court possesses the self-executing authority to remove cases to itself (see People v Levandowski, 190 Misc 2d 738 [Sup Ct, Rensselaer County 2002]). [read post]
6 Aug 2021, 4:43 am
The case is entitled Barker v. [read post]
1 Nov 2012, 7:07 am
What I mean by this is that many people convince themselves with absolute certainty that certain events took place, even though circumstances arise that may show this to be completely impossible and conclusively false. [read post]
1 Nov 2012, 7:07 am
What I mean by this is that many people convince themselves with absolute certainty that certain events took place, even though circumstances arise that may show this to be completely impossible and conclusively false. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 9:15 am
In People v. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 7:37 am
That a simplified version of the P&I Clause but the point is that it ensures "the citizens of the United States [are] one people, by placing the citizens of each State upon the same footing with citizens of other States," even if people in those other states elect someone that we despise to the White House.The case is Clement v. [read post]
