Search for: "STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY" Results 6001 - 6020 of 9,042
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Mar 2009, 5:20 pm
 Appellants persisted with their challenge to the denial of emergency rulemaking, an agency decision upheld by the District Court in New Jersey. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 7:58 am by A. Benjamin Spencer
” To show that its “principal place of business” was in New Jersey, not California, Hertz submitted a declaration stating, among other things, that it operated facilities in 44 States, that California accounted for only a portion of its business activity, that its leadership is at its corporate headquarters in New Jersey, and that its core executive and administrative functions are primarily carried out there. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 11:21 am by Kara M. Maciel
  This ruling is consistent with a recent decision by the Appellate Division of the New Jersey Superior Court which held that tips are not “earnings” subject to garnishment under New Jersey law. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 10:38 am by <a href=''>Kara M. Maciel</a>
  This ruling is consistent with a recent decision by the Appellate Division of the New Jersey Superior Court which held that tips are not “earnings” subject to garnishment under New Jersey law. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 10:21 am by Kara M. Maciel
This ruling is consistent with a recent decision by the Appellate Division of the New Jersey Superior Court which held that tips are not “earnings” subject to garnishment under New Jersey law. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 11:38 am by Kara M. Maciel
  This ruling is consistent with a recent decision by the Appellate Division of the New Jersey Superior Court which held that tips are not “earnings” subject to garnishment under New Jersey law. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 12:07 pm by Camilla Alexandra Hrdy
Formosa Chemical & Fibre, 229 F.3d 254 (2000) (casting doubt on whether New Jersey state law would govern the consultant's sharing of the secrets in Taiwan).Example 4. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 11:15 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Here, the relevant state law was that of New Jersey:Thus, the law of the state of New Jersey governs these Agreements. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 3:30 am by Jim Walker
But maritime cases are not governed by New Jersey law. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 3:29 am by Blog Editorial
Her Majesty’s Attorney General for the Bailiwick of Jersey (Jersey), heard 9 February 2011. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 11:42 pm
But if the MDL Panel chooses to centralize those same cases in New York, Michigan plaintiffs do not automatically lose.And remember: Seven other states have immunity laws that resemble in some ways the Michigan law. [read post]
7 Feb 2007, 12:26 am
Salins, an associate at the firm, summarize recent legislative developments in New York and New Jersey -- including the Garden State's recognition of civil unions -- which provide for key changes in the workplace and highlight some of the steps that employers will need to take to be in compliance.   Communications and Media LawFriday, February 2, 2007By James C. [read post]