Search for: "State v. Bill"
Results 6001 - 6020
of 19,678
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Nov 2011, 5:38 pm
ACLU and Ashcroft v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 11:37 am
Ideology v. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 11:26 am
As of July 24, there are currently 23 bills in 13 other states that could potentially legalize sports betting. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 6:06 am
The Salem Statesman Journal covers last week’s decision in Premo v. [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 4:38 am
Draft Online Safety Bill The UK government published its draft Online Safety Bill in May 2021. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 7:36 am
There are many changes in the present form of the bill from that earlier debated in the legislature, by the State Bar, various family law committees, and the like, as this issue has quickly come to a head. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
I agree with Bill Galston’s observation in this symposium that informal means of adaptation are not necessarily equivalent in terms of legitimacy to formal means under Article V. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 9:22 pm
(Afro Leo says check here for background.)The topic of his lecture was “Deprivation of Trade Marks through State Interference”. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 10:39 am
Justin, the Court denied reconsideration and ordered Justin to pay the bill of costs. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 6:23 am
” United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 6:23 am
” United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 11:10 am
Honda as ". . .a comprehensive bill to promote the development and responsible stewardship of nanotechnology in the United States . . . . [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 1:40 pm
Illinois, along with several other states, have initiated the re-sentencing of those who received life terms as juveniles following the 2012 Supreme Court decision in Miller v. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 4:15 am
"In formulating his ruling, Justice Devine noted the decision by the Appellate Division in Civil Service Employees Ass'n v New York State Public Employee Relations Board, 46 AD3d 1037, but concluded that the decision was not a controlling precedent in this case. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 11:41 am
In United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 12:48 am
" Lawrence v. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 6:18 am
United States Postal Service, et al. [read post]
13 Jan 2025, 5:51 am
Some recent spots from Bill Freivogel: Abreu v. [read post]
8 Jan 2025, 4:14 am
Also contrary to plaintiffs’ contention, the Brooks affidavit did not require the attachment of SZS’s billing statements, as Seibel not only failed to object to the billing statements, but admittedly paid the fees (see Aronson Mayefsky & Sloan, LLP v Praeger, 228 AD3d 182, 185 [1st Dept 2024]). [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 10:06 pm
" - Benjamin Franklin (United States Constitution, Bill of Rights) © 2006-2009 Sex Offender Issues , All Rights Reserved [read post]
