Search for: "State v. House"
Results 6001 - 6020
of 28,800
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2020, 3:34 pm
Here, the leading precedent in South Dakota v. [read post]
13 May 2020, 3:26 pm
G.S. 15A-1344(f)(3); State v. [read post]
13 May 2020, 6:20 am
Trump v. [read post]
13 May 2020, 4:02 am
But the lawyer arguing for the House in Trump v. [read post]
13 May 2020, 3:46 am
Washington and Colorado Department of State v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 9:00 pm
Do South Dakota v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 6:30 pm
They compare it to Clinton Administration Solicitor General Drew Days' famous mistake in United States v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 3:58 pm
Both Jon and Mike referenced the infamous exchange from United States v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 3:36 pm
So the House might take an interest in constraining the President, or expanding his powers, or granting itself plenary power, or reallocating Senators (among consenting states), or establishing a church, or reopening final bankruptcy judgments, or regulating the private lives of celebrities, or whatever. [read post]
12 May 2020, 3:23 pm
A majority of the justices appeared skeptical of claims, made by a lawyer for the House of Representatives, that the committees have broad power to request the president’s personal papers, but they seemed equally dubious in the second argument that the president has the categorical immunity from state grand-jury proceedings that he is claiming. [read post]
12 May 2020, 3:14 pm
An Australian law firm’s “Tips and tricks for online hearings” refers to a ruling by the Federal Court of Australia that a case with 50 witnesses that was scheduled for six weeks would proceed virtually, despite the objection of one of the parties (Capic v Ford Motor Company of Australia Limited (Adjournment)). [read post]
12 May 2020, 1:57 pm
States have the power to determine the qualifications of voters; there’s a plausible argument that includes the power to enforce qualifications, as the Supreme Court suggested in Arizona v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 1:20 pm
Given that the Secretary of State for Housing has apparently said that whether the ban on evictions would be extended was reliant on ‘medical evidence’, one might start to see a picture coming together. [read post]
12 May 2020, 12:52 pm
[Issues from Trump v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 11:59 am
V. [read post]
12 May 2020, 8:52 am
A pivotal moment during oral argument in United States v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 8:14 am
And, it gets tougher – during this state of emergency, CMS (the federal agency housing Medicare) has changed MANY of their billing and service requirements. [read post]
12 May 2020, 5:06 am
Farmer, John, and V. [read post]
12 May 2020, 4:05 am
Mazars and Trump v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 4:00 am
Trump v. [read post]
