Search for: "Test Plaintiff" Results 6001 - 6020 of 21,970
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Nov 2013, 5:00 am
The employee claimed that the agreement violated the Americans with Disabilities Act's ADA's prohibition of "qualification standards, employment tests or other selection criteria that screen out or tend to screen out an individual with a disability." [read post]
30 Dec 2023, 2:43 pm by Unknown
OEHHA wants to force companies to have to run very costly tests on hundreds of potential chemicals (many not testable) so that they can list the chemical(s) in the warning text before they can use the safe harbor short form warning. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 4:00 am
Indeed, the FLSA has a seasonality test, which could exempt baseball teams from having to abide by the minimum wage and overtime requirements. [read post]
3 Aug 2013, 2:41 pm by Michael W. Huseman
 Two pot-smoking, cop-fighting ne'er-do-wells do not exactly make the most sympathetic plaintiffs ever, but it's definitely an interesting case. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 7:25 am by Docket Navigator
The Court is applying the requisite threshold test -- but in the context of summary judgment. . . . [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 5:49 am by Allan Blutstein
IRS that plaintiff was eligible for attorney’s fees even though it never received responsive documents. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 6:58 am by Docket Navigator
Pulse Elecs., Inc., No. 14-1513, 579 U.S. __ (June 13, 2016)], the Supreme Court rejected the Federal Circuit’s two-part test from Seagate for determining when a district court may award enhanced damages as inconsistent with § 284. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 6:57 am by Docket Navigator
Ct. 2347 (2014)] is not a novelty test; it is improper to ask under Alice 'has this been done before.' That is a novelty question. . . . [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 4:00 am
Meyer's prediction: Supreme Court adopts the Seventh Circuit's test. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
And if I were deciding this case on a blank slate, I would agree and grant the plaintiffs no relief. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 3:28 pm
The defendants moved to transfer under § 1404, and Judge Nathan undertook the well-established multi-factor test for considering such motions. [read post]
15 Mar 2015, 3:30 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
 This means performing due diligence and investigating the vendor’s physical and virtual security practices, track record, and recent intrusion testing results, among other things. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 1:03 am by Jon Gelman
The False Claims Act’s public disclosure bar does not prevent a water purification specialist's lawsuit accusing Halliburton Co and KBR Inc of violating contractual duties to test and purify lavatory and drinking water used by U.S. troops in Iraq, a federal court in Virginia ruled on Thursday. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 3:11 am by Jon Gelman
“This year’s theme, ‘Lead-Free Kids for a Healthy Future,’ underscores the importance of testing your home for lead and understanding how to prevent harmful exposures. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 8:45 am by Kristine Meredith
What scientific tests may plaintiffs’ experts perform on the evidence found at the fire’s origin? [read post]
17 Nov 2013, 5:31 am by Jon Gelman
“JM Eagle deceived outside inspection agencies and ignored over a decade of failing test results. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 8:40 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Jan. 16, 2024) The court grants plaintiff's motion for reconsideration of parts of this case, discussed previously. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 5:57 am by Staci Zaretsky
* "The Department’s actions violate law and are contrary to basic principles of fairness and deeply damaging to the critical public service missions of these plaintiffs and the ABA. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 10:21 am
Randy Roginski, a 41-year-old Ohio native, was working as a paving inspector on an active construction site for Solar Testing Labs, Inc. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 5:44 am by Timothy P. Flynn
Also, the trial judge rejected the newspaper's attempt to characterize Levitt as a "public figure", which would significantly increase the defamation plaintiff's burden of proof in presenting his case to a jury.All of this bodes well for Mr. [read post]