Search for: "U.S. v. Mark"
Results 6001 - 6020
of 11,360
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2014, 7:00 am
”[15] Two years later, in Bigelow v. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 1:17 pm
Apple has had a U.S. trademark for its store design since January, 2013. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 4:21 am
The 76 Act marked the first statutory reference to fair use. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 12:46 pm
U.S. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 4:00 am
In addition, trade-marks and distinguishing guise do not extend to a “functional use or characteristic” (see s. 13(2) of the Trademarks Act and Kirkbi AG v. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 3:07 am
.* A Most Un-Magical of U.S. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 12:29 am
So, let’s hope the U.S. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 11:06 pm
Richard Kopf, Senior U.S. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 4:42 am
” At Business Insider, Erin Fuchs previews next month’s argument in Holt v. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 6:20 pm
They do not share the cultural and structural characteristics of highly integrated and self-referential codes of law that mark the essential characteristic of civil law systems—systems grounded essentially on the primacy if statutes and the rejection of law declared and administered by governmental institutions other than the legislature. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 7:23 am
Read the entire 40 page opinion in Baskin v. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 6:23 am
Read the entire 40 page opinion in Baskin v. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 1:05 am
Trade mark dilution has not been found in the U.S. when a famous mark is used for parody (Louis Vuitton Malletier v Haute Diggity Dog, LLC., 464 F. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 7:20 pm
In fact, the Board determined that Jakemans is a very rare surname in the U.S. [read post]
7 Sep 2014, 9:30 pm
Klee As this year marks the thirtieth anniversary of the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Chevron U.S.A. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2014, 5:30 am
V. [read post]
7 Sep 2014, 5:30 am
V. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 5:33 am
The Independence Institute wants to run two ads, one asking U.S. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 12:42 pm
Levine, 555 U.S. 555 (2009), an implied preemption drug case, in opposition to “different from or in addition to” express preemption under the Medical Device Amendments. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 11:42 am
Hargis Industries — effect on federal district court trademark infringement lawsuit of a decision by the federal trademark appeals board on whether a mark is likely to create confusion with another mark Whitfield v. [read post]
