Search for: "United States v. Little"
Results 6001 - 6020
of 10,414
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm
In United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2007, 4:19 am
Many features of a political culture can cause people to think of themselves as a collective subject that persists over time; but, at least in the United States, our Constitution also performs this function. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 5:07 am
In 2008 the hearing officer found that the goodwill accrued by the group between 1963 and 1966 had long dissipated [an appropriate word, notes Merpel, given that few groups at that time gave the appearance of being anything like as dissipated as the Animals] by the date of Steel's application, despite the minor top-ups provided by half-hearted reunions, re-releases of the same song, and its induction into a United States museum. [read post]
8 Dec 2013, 5:33 pm
(Hint: the answer ain’t “fifty . . . .)United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 1:36 pm
, it “adds little or no source-indicating distinctiveness to a mark" (cf. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 5:03 am
Supreme Court will decide Young v. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 2:23 am
Wyndham Worldwide Corp., et al., Defendants, Civil Action No. 13-1887 (ES), United States District Court, D. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 12:05 pm
” Durham v. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 6:26 am
The en banc ruling produced passionate dissenting opinions from three Circuit judges, one of whom suggested the search was actually motivated.The case is United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2013, 3:15 pm
United States v. [read post]
31 May 2013, 4:59 am
A week ago the United States International Trade Commission (USITC, or just ITC) tossed Motorola's complaint against Microsoft's Xbox. [read post]
18 Dec 2016, 8:24 am
”) Finally, Brenda Wineapple covers Steven Hahn’s A Nation Without Borders: The United States and Its World in an Age of Civil Wars, 1830-1910, the “most sweeping indictment to date of the American appetite for conquest. [read post]
21 Apr 2013, 3:20 pm
There again, the peculiarly interesting state of trade mark law in the United Kingdom and, not far beyond it, in the territory of the European Economic Area, might be closer to the cause. [read post]
11 Jul 2015, 6:49 pm
Lucky this case isn’t in a Canadian court.United States v. [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 8:37 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 9:05 am
United States. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 4:30 am
The case, EEOC v. [read post]
9 Jun 2013, 9:01 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 11:19 am
It appears that Merck KGaA (MK) alleged that MSD had infringed its trade mark in the United Kingdom and, while it's not stated explicitly in the note received by this Kat, it looks as though there had been use of the mark but that MSD was arguing that it was a use that was permitted under the terms of the agreement, since MSD was arguing here that the agreement was governed by New Jersey law. [read post]
28 Jul 2017, 1:48 am
From that side of the pond United States and Canada are members [full list of members can be found here]. [read post]
