Search for: "W. D."
Results 6001 - 6020
of 13,766
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jun 2013, 12:52 pm
Charles Schumer (D. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 11:01 am
Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 11:08 am
The Post notes that all those sanctioned were already subject to previous U.S. sanctions issued under the George W. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 12:33 pm
” The court concluded that “[w]hat Biomet has done complies fully with the requirements of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26(b) and 34(b)(2). [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 8:15 am
Law Office of W.F. ''Casey'' Ebsary Jr 2102 W Cleveland St Tampa, Florida 33606 (813) 222-2220 [read post]
30 Dec 2017, 4:01 pm
Roberts, Robert C. and W. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 5:01 am
Listing their occupation as “private-sector workers,” they attached Forms 4852, Substitute for Form W-2, reporting zero wages, including boiler-plate statements that they did not receive wages. [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 7:02 am
We live in an age of miracles and wonders; I’m not saying I’d expect cheese to last centuries, but leaving a dry cheese like parmesan sealed but unrefrigerated seems plausible to me. [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 12:29 pm
Jonathan W. [read post]
21 Sep 2018, 6:16 am
You get both for a lower price than you'd pay for just the audiobook, and it's great to be able to find things in the text after you've heard them in the audiobook, especially for me, blogging and wanting to cut and paste. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 10:00 pm
§ 1274(d). [read post]
3 May 2013, 8:34 am
” Notably, the court instructed that to the extent costs are excessive, a party may seek a protective order (which Gallo did) and that “[w]hen, as here, a district court denies a protective order, the movant can appeal that decision” but “it cannot obtain the same relief from § 1920 which “impose[s] rigid controls on cost-shifting in the federal courts. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 10:30 am
See also Library andBook Trade Almanac 511 (D. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 8:08 am
D. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 8:36 am
D(A), 2008 ABPC 379, the Alberta Provincial Court dismissed a father's application for guardianship of his child and ordered modest access, relying in part on the fact that the father had "demonstrated and displayed publicly (at least to his some 95 'friends' on his Facebook page) his disregard and callous lack of consideration of the mother" and that the father had simultaneously posted photos of the child online, thereby linking "the child to his… [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 3:43 am
Examining Attorney Steven W. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 5:40 am
Even on that basis, disclosure theory is deficient: "[d]isclosure theory cannot, however, support the modern patent system. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 1:42 pm
How'd that work out again? [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 7:50 am
Berzon, a Clinton appointee, and Judge Andrew D. [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:27 pm
It observed that “[W]hen a child has been wrongfully removed or retained from his country of habitual residence, Article 12 of the Hague Convention generally requires the deciding authority (here, a district court) to order the return of the child. [read post]
