Search for: "Cost v. Cost"
Results 6021 - 6040
of 48,975
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Aug 2009, 1:17 pm
Co. v. [read post]
20 May 2010, 11:52 am
[Post by Venkat] Asis Internet Servs. v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 6:29 am
In Rahabi v. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 11:38 pm
By Larry Wescott Henry v. [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 8:43 am
Motorola Sols., Inc. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 4:37 am
DE v AB [2010] EWHC 3792 (Fam), just reported on Bailii, concerned a father's appeal against a Schedule 1 Children Act award. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 6:14 am
June Medical Services v. [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 6:58 am
Buckhorn v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 9:51 am
In FTC v. [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 1:01 pm
The judgment sets out the relevant extracts from the key authority Ridehalgh v Horsefield, and Watson v Watson [1994] 2 FLR 194. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 12:29 pm
A “stop-work” order was issued, halting the project on the spot.The contractor proposed a variance, but later learned that while the City could issue a variance from the FEMA requirement, doing so might cost the City its FEMA rating, leading to a widespread increase in the cost of flood insurance for every resident of the City living in a flood zone. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 8:18 am
The Holland v. [read post]
3 Sep 2018, 8:14 am
The cargo interests argue that it does not and therefore the costs should be paid by the owners. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 6:36 am
1–800 Contacts, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 10:13 am
Isn’t Lott’s pursuit of the case strong evidence that he believes he could recover more than his costs? [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 11:27 am
The Supreme Court of Canada will have to answer that question in the case of Re: Sound v. [read post]
18 Jul 2015, 8:59 am
JDate, Nicosia v. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 1:36 pm
Under our constitution issues of taxation and expenditure are the province of Parliament. pa 10: While the Consultation Paper opens with a clear acknowledgement of the role of the courts, the bulk of the Paper, the proposals it contains and the prevailing approach appear to be based on a view that recourse to the courts is a matter of discretionary spending by those who can afford to and should pay its full cost and, in some cases, more than its full cost. [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 5:00 am
In the case of Huffsmith v. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 10:30 pm
However, it most cases, litigants cannot afford this type of valuation.Recently, in Morgan v. [read post]
