Search for: "Good v. State" Results 6021 - 6040 of 44,380
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Dec 2023, 8:33 am by CMS
” The trial Judge’s decision was based on various authorities, from Fielding v Variety Inc [1967] 2 QB 841 (CA) to BHX v GRX [2021] EWHC 770 (QB), and the lower court ultimately dismissed the libel and slander claims for want of serious harm. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 1:43 pm
Barnum famously said, any publicity is good publicity, at least if they list you with the right firm. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 12:43 pm
for $1.2 million in which the County is suing the City for (1) dangerous condition of public property, (2) trespass, (3) nuisance, (4) waste, (5) indemnity and contribution, (6) removal of lateral and “subadjacent” (sic) support, (7) declaratory relief, (8) account stated, and (9) goods and services rendered. [read post]
26 May 2020, 10:06 am by Larry
 That brings us to the first of a pair of decisions: United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 11:14 am
Yet, it was not until the Federal Circuit's decision in Forest Group, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 6:41 pm
   In his report the Independent Expert on the effects of foreign debt and other related international financial obligations of States on the full enjoyment of human rights, particularly economic, social and cultural rights, presents guiding principles on human rights impact assessments of economic reforms, which set out the human rights principles and standards that apply to States, international financial institutions and creditors when designing, formulating or… [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 12:08 pm by Eric Goldman
2016 has been a tough year for Section 230 jurisprudence, and the nadir (so far) was the appellate court ruling in Hassell v. [read post]
2 Mar 2008, 1:00 pm
McGee-v-Allstate.pdfThis racketeering allegations were filed by a physician, John McGee, just one month after he filed a similar racketeering complaint against State Farm. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 3:23 am
Fraud: Nature's Sunshine alleged that Petitioner Thrive twice falsely stated that it was using its mark THRIVE on all of the goods in its registration, when it had used the mark only on some of the goods. [read post]