Search for: "ROUNDS v. STATE"
Results 6021 - 6040
of 7,626
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Aug 2011, 8:04 am
Gates reminds us that "Regardless of what Texas law may authorize, entry into a house by the [state] must satisfy Fourth Amendment standards. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 2:00 pm
In Lutz v. [read post]
25 May 2019, 8:55 am
There was also what became a lively round-table discussion about dealing with unique discovery issues. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 3:32 pm
Earlier: Lawsuit of the Day: Lancaster v. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 3:00 am
Tyler v. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
… Double AspectSome Major Questions About Major Questions In West Virginia v EPA, the Supreme Court of the United States, wielding the “major questions doctrine” found that the EPA did not have the statutory authority to adopt regulations implementing the Clean Power Plan, initially proposed by the Obama administration in 2015. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 3:22 am
Art. 94 of the Cultural Heritage Act requires if a person finds such artifact to contact the nearest state or council museum and hand the found item to its director.A commission of experts will be then appointed by the Museum to classify if the found object is a ‘cultural heritage’ or not. [read post]
23 May 2024, 2:12 pm
Earlier today, the Mississippi Supreme Court released its opinion in Allen v. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 10:24 am
While she was making the rounds of the Senate while waiting to be confirmed, one Western senator challenged her on gun control. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 8:33 am
” “That is the situation that was recently addressed by the Supreme Court of New Jersey in Meisels v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 6:39 pm
Many other Bishops may not be aware of it just now, but they are going to face plenty of storms in their own dioceses after they return.This is not like General Convention 2003, when people had to read the news about the confirmation of V. [read post]
28 Jul 2012, 7:26 am
Harrow Community Support Ltd v. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 4:22 pm
Just this week, a state supreme court ruled against a man who underwent surgery to take out his Medtronic defibrillator because there was a chance the device device's battery could fail. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 4:22 pm
Just this week, a state supreme court ruled against a man who underwent surgery to take out his Medtronic defibrillator because there was a chance the device device's battery could fail. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 9:02 am
On copyright, this most prominently includes the case Golan v. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 5:56 pm
You can have the history of Brazil v. [read post]
28 Jul 2012, 7:26 am
Harrow Community Support Ltd v. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 9:01 am
(See Mitchell v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 7:12 am
These same unions may need to decide whether, in the event of continuing protests, to forcibly remove "agitators" and round up Democratic state senators. [read post]
